Piperic
AI Access Report
AI Report
🌍 The AI Access Report · 2026-07-13

🇺🇦 Ukraine's web is open to AI by silence — 93% have made no choice at all

Of 67,751 live Ukrainian websites, 3,315 (4.89%) block an AI crawler. But 93% neither block nor declare anything, and conscious AI-policy adoption is among the lowest in Europe.

Analysis of 41,818,678 live, content-validated websites worldwide · snapshot 2026-07-13 · by Piperic

Share:XLinkedIn

95.1%open to AI crawlers

Ukraine's web is cautious on the surface but passive underneath. Of 67,751 live Ukrainian sites, 4.89% block an AI crawler — 33rd of 43 countries, more defensive than Poland (4.45%) but less than Romania (5.43%) — while an overwhelming 92.71% are 'open by silence', neither blocking AI nor declaring any policy.

Conscious engagement is among the lowest in Europe: just 2.42% of Ukrainian sites have published an AI policy file, and llms.txt adoption sits at 2.63%. Attractions lead the defensive table sharply at 14.73% — the tourism-and-heritage reflex — followed by sport (5.19%). The press is close to the national norm at 6.44%.

Where Ukraine blocks, it does so precisely: only 3.2% of GPTBot-blockers accidentally lost ChatGPT Search, half the global rate. Ukraine's story is not fear of AI but the absence of a decision — an exposed web that hasn't yet turned to the question.

The three numbers that matter

95.14%
AI Training Exposure
share of sites NOT blocking any AI training bot (GPTBot, ClaudeBot, CCBot…) — their content can be used for model training.
99.63%
AI Search Visibility
share of sites reachable by AI search crawlers (OAI-SearchBot, PerplexityBot…) — they can appear in AI answers.
7.33%
AI Policy Maturity
share of sites with ANY conscious, machine-readable AI signal (llms.txt, ai.txt, robots AI rules, ToS clause). Low = the web hasn't decided yet.

Where Ukraine stands in the world

Share of sites blocking at least one AI crawler — lower = more open. Ukraine ranks #33 of 44 countries analysed.

#1 🇯🇵 Japan1.0%#2 🇨🇳 China1.08%#3 🇩🇪 Germany1.58%#4 🇦🇹 Austria1.82%#5 🇷🇺 Russia1.85%#6 🇫🇷 France2.14%#7 🇧🇪 Belgium2.23%#8 🇪🇪 Estonia2.66%#28 🇭🇺 Hungary4.32%#31 🇵🇱 Poland4.45%#33 🇺🇦 Ukraine4.89%#39 🇷🇴 Romania5.43%

Neighbours shown for context. Full ranking in the data download.

💬 33rd of 43 — the more cautious half, between Poland (4.45%) and Romania (5.43%). Eastern Europe clusters in this range.

The four AI postures of Ukraine's web

Every website falls into one of four groups, based on what it blocks and what it declares:

92.71%
Open by silence
doesn't block AI and declares nothing — no decision has been made. This is the real story: the vast majority.
2.42%
Consciously open
doesn't block AI and publishes an explicit policy file (llms.txt / ai.txt) — a deliberate yes.
4.5%
Controlled access
blocks training bots but stays visible to AI search — the technically mature strategy.
0.37%
AI-dark
blocks AI search crawlers too — protected, but disappearing from AI answers.
Open by silence: 92.71%Consciously open: 2.42%Controlled access: 4.5%AI-dark: 0.37%92.71%Open by silence
💬 92.71% silent and only 2.42% consciously open — among the lowest awareness in Europe. Openness here is entirely passive.

The ChatGPT-invisibility paradox

2,949GPTBot ⛔
94+ OAI-SearchBot ⛔
3.2%ChatGPT Search ✕

2,949 Ukraine websites block GPTBot to keep their content out of AI training. But 94 of them — 3.2% — ALSO block OAI-SearchBot, most likely by accident. Those sites have removed themselves from ChatGPT Search results entirely: protected from training, but invisible where their customers now search.

GPTBot (training) and OAI-SearchBot (ChatGPT Search) are independent robots.txt tokens — blocking one does not block the other.

💬 3.2% accidental self-exclusion — one of the lowest rates, so the little blocking that happens is deliberate.

Which AI bots does Ukraine block?

Share of Ukraine sites blocking each crawler in robots.txt.

GPTBot4.35%CCBot4.28%Amazonbot4.23%ClaudeBot4.2%Bytespider · TikTok4.12%Meta-ExternalAgent4.07%Google-Extended4.03%Applebot-Extended3.93%ChatGPT-User0.29%

Bytespider is ByteDance's (TikTok) crawler — it ignores robots.txt more often than the majors, yet it is among the most-blocked.

Industry by industry: who blocks, who doesn't

AI-blocking and llms.txt adoption across Ukraine's biggest website categories.

SectorSitesBlocks AIllms.txt
📰 News & media8236.44%10.21%
business and finance11,4493.89%2.65%
home and garden7,8854.02%2.57%
style and fashion5,6273.73%3.68%
attractions5,43214.73%0.44%
shopping5,3493.2%2.15%
technology and computing5,0404.78%2.6%
automotive4,9683.97%2.25%
medical health2,5954.12%3.74%
personal finance2,0443.18%3.47%
sports1,9065.19%1.99%
hobbies and interests1,6363.18%2.32%

Ukraine news sites block AI 1.3× more often than the national average (6.44% vs 4.89%) — publishers are the most defensive segment of the web.

💬 Attractions block sharply at 14.73% — the heritage-and-tourism reflex — while the press stays near the average (6.44%).

The e-commerce exposure

14,207 Ukraine online shops are open to AI crawlers (95.3% of 14,912). Their product content can already be read, compared and recommended by AI assistants — whether they know it or not.

Platform matters

Share of sites blocking at least one AI bot, by platform:

4.83%WordPress0.94%Shopify4.89%country average

The trend starts here

This is the baseline edition (2026-07-13). Piperic re-measures continuously; the next edition will show how fast Ukraine's web is closing — or opening.

💬 Ukraine begins exposed and undecided, with very low formal AI adoption. The next edition tracks whether deliberate policy starts to appear.

Check your own website

Free, no signup — see your site the way AI crawlers do:

For journalists — press kit

“Ukraine's web is open the way much of Eastern Europe is: not by decision, but by silence. Ninety-three percent of sites have made no AI choice at all, and formal AI policies are rare. The infrastructure is exposed; the deliberation hasn't happened yet,”
— said Attila Rácz-Akácosi, founder of Piperic.

How to cite: “According to Piperic's AI Access Report (2026-07-13), based on 67,751 live Ukraine websites…” — link to this page.

Download the country dataset (JSON) Global rankings dataset

Methodology

Sample: 67,751 live, content-validated websites (Ukraine, ccTLD-based assignment), out of 41,818,678 live domains analysed worldwide. “Live” = HTTP 200 and not parked. “Blocks AI” = the site's robots.txt disallows at least one of 14 known AI crawlers. llms.txt/ai.txt = the file exists at the site root. Snapshot: 2026-07-13 (frozen — numbers do not move with the live crawl). Full-web note: these figures cover the ENTIRE live web including the long tail; industry headlines like “25% of top sites block GPTBot” measure only large publishers — both are true, they measure different things. Country assignment via ccTLD under-counts .com/.org sites; treat US figures as indicative.

Press contact: press@piperic.com · Data: Piperic Business Intelligence

Every number on this page is reproducible from the public dataset above.

Country reports

🌍 Worldwide🇩🇪 Germany🇷🇺 Russia🇬🇧 United Kingdom🇳🇱 Netherlands🇫🇷 France🇧🇷 Brazil🇨🇭 Switzerland🇯🇵 Japan🇵🇱 Poland🇦🇺 Australia🇸🇪 Sweden🇨🇳 China🇮🇹 Italy🇨🇦 Canada🇨🇿 Czechia🇧🇪 Belgium🇦🇹 Austria🇪🇸 Spain🇮🇳 India🇨🇴 Colombia🇸🇰 Slovakia🇩🇰 Denmark🇭🇺 Hungary🇲🇽 Mexico🇳🇴 Norway🇰🇷 South Korea🇦🇷 Argentina🇳🇿 New Zealand🇫🇮 Finland🇬🇷 Greece🇺🇦 Ukraine🇨🇱 Chile🇿🇦 South Africa🇷🇴 Romania🇻🇳 Vietnam🇹🇷 Turkey🇪🇪 Estonia🇵🇹 Portugal🇹🇼 Taiwan🇮🇪 Ireland🇮🇱 Israel🇮🇩 Indonesia🇱🇹 Lithuania