Piperic
AI Access Report
AI Report
🌍 The AI Access Report · 2026-07-13

🇳🇿 New Zealand's web is quietly one of the most AI-aware in the world

Of 76,371 live New Zealand websites, 3,150 (4.12%) block an AI crawler — but a remarkable 15% have consciously published an AI policy file, one of the highest rates on Earth.

Analysis of 41,818,678 live, content-validated websites worldwide · snapshot 2026-07-13 · by Piperic

Share:XLinkedIn

95.9%open to AI crawlers

New Zealand's web is small but strikingly self-aware. Of 76,371 live sites, 4.12% block an AI crawler (23rd of 43), yet an extraordinary 15.3% have consciously opted in with a policy file — and 15.66% publish llms.txt, among the very highest rates anywhere in this report, ahead of Australia and most of Europe.

Kiwi newsrooms are moderately defensive at 15.7% — well below Australia's 25% across the Tasman, but far above the national average. The most-blocked sector is attractions (9.1%), the familiar tourism reflex of a country that markets itself to the world. Sport follows at 5.57%.

And New Zealand blocks precisely: just 4.7% of GPTBot-blockers accidentally shut out ChatGPT Search, below the global 6.1%. For a web this size, the combination of world-leading llms.txt adoption and low accidental self-harm is a standout — New Zealand has thought about AI more than almost anyone.

The three numbers that matter

95.89%
AI Training Exposure
share of sites NOT blocking any AI training bot (GPTBot, ClaudeBot, CCBot…) — their content can be used for model training.
99.4%
AI Search Visibility
share of sites reachable by AI search crawlers (OAI-SearchBot, PerplexityBot…) — they can appear in AI answers.
19.95%
AI Policy Maturity
share of sites with ANY conscious, machine-readable AI signal (llms.txt, ai.txt, robots AI rules, ToS clause). Low = the web hasn't decided yet.

Where New Zealand stands in the world

Share of sites blocking at least one AI crawler — lower = more open. New Zealand ranks #23 of 44 countries analysed.

#1 🇯🇵 Japan1.0%#2 🇨🇳 China1.08%#3 🇩🇪 Germany1.58%#4 🇦🇹 Austria1.82%#5 🇷🇺 Russia1.85%#6 🇫🇷 France2.14%#7 🇧🇪 Belgium2.23%#8 🇪🇪 Estonia2.66%#14 🇦🇺 Australia3.4%#23 🇳🇿 New Zealand4.12%

Neighbours shown for context. Full ranking in the data download.

💬 23rd of 43 — mid-table on blocking, but a global leader on conscious openness. Australia (3.4%) is slightly more open; the two Antipodean webs move together.

The four AI postures of New Zealand's web

Every website falls into one of four groups, based on what it blocks and what it declares:

80.57%
Open by silence
doesn't block AI and declares nothing — no decision has been made. This is the real story: the vast majority.
15.31%
Consciously open
doesn't block AI and publishes an explicit policy file (llms.txt / ai.txt) — a deliberate yes.
3.52%
Controlled access
blocks training bots but stays visible to AI search — the technically mature strategy.
0.6%
AI-dark
blocks AI search crawlers too — protected, but disappearing from AI answers.
Open by silence: 80.57%Consciously open: 15.31%Controlled access: 3.52%AI-dark: 0.6%80.57%Open by silence
💬 15.3% consciously open — the highest share in this report. Nowhere else has a larger minority that has actively said yes to AI in writing.

The ChatGPT-invisibility paradox

2,890GPTBot ⛔
136+ OAI-SearchBot ⛔
4.7%ChatGPT Search ✕

2,890 New Zealand websites block GPTBot to keep their content out of AI training. But 136 of them — 4.7% — ALSO block OAI-SearchBot, most likely by accident. Those sites have removed themselves from ChatGPT Search results entirely: protected from training, but invisible where their customers now search.

GPTBot (training) and OAI-SearchBot (ChatGPT Search) are independent robots.txt tokens — blocking one does not block the other.

💬 4.7% accidental self-exclusion, below the global average — clean, deliberate blocking.

Which AI bots does New Zealand block?

Share of New Zealand sites blocking each crawler in robots.txt.

GPTBot3.78%ClaudeBot3.65%CCBot3.65%Amazonbot3.55%Bytespider · TikTok3.51%Google-Extended3.42%Meta-ExternalAgent3.37%Applebot-Extended3.3%ChatGPT-User0.48%

Bytespider is ByteDance's (TikTok) crawler — it ignores robots.txt more often than the majors, yet it is among the most-blocked.

Industry by industry: who blocks, who doesn't

AI-blocking and llms.txt adoption across New Zealand's biggest website categories.

SectorSitesBlocks AIllms.txt
📰 News & media22315.7%1.79%
business and finance15,1393.87%9.08%
home and garden7,3153.19%14.2%
technology and computing4,7364.69%8.74%
attractions3,7049.1%5.99%
sports3,6635.57%19.03%
automotive3,3793.37%17.25%
style and fashion3,3441.53%52.45%
personal finance3,2103.93%13.64%
medical health3,0633.72%9.73%
travel2,9964.37%9.95%
hobbies and interests2,9483.36%19.61%

New Zealand news sites block AI 3.8× more often than the national average (15.7% vs 4.12%) — publishers are the most defensive segment of the web.

💬 Attractions lead the defensive table (9.1%) — the tourism paradox. News sites (15.7%) are cautious but nowhere near the Australian extreme.

The e-commerce exposure

21,948 New Zealand online shops are open to AI crawlers (97.1% of 22,606). Their product content can already be read, compared and recommended by AI assistants — whether they know it or not.

Platform matters

Share of sites blocking at least one AI bot, by platform:

4.05%WordPress0.88%Shopify4.12%country average

The trend starts here

This is the baseline edition (2026-07-13). Piperic re-measures continuously; the next edition will show how fast New Zealand's web is closing — or opening.

💬 New Zealand starts as arguably the world's most AI-aware small web. The baseline is set unusually high; the next edition shows if awareness turns into new blocking or stays open.

Check your own website

Free, no signup — see your site the way AI crawlers do:

For journalists — press kit

“New Zealand punches far above its size on AI awareness: fifteen percent of Kiwi sites have published an llms.txt — a world-leading rate that dwarfs most of Europe. It's a small web that has done a lot of thinking,”
— said Attila Rácz-Akácosi, founder of Piperic.

How to cite: “According to Piperic's AI Access Report (2026-07-13), based on 76,371 live New Zealand websites…” — link to this page.

Download the country dataset (JSON) Global rankings dataset

Methodology

Sample: 76,371 live, content-validated websites (New Zealand, ccTLD-based assignment), out of 41,818,678 live domains analysed worldwide. “Live” = HTTP 200 and not parked. “Blocks AI” = the site's robots.txt disallows at least one of 14 known AI crawlers. llms.txt/ai.txt = the file exists at the site root. Snapshot: 2026-07-13 (frozen — numbers do not move with the live crawl). Full-web note: these figures cover the ENTIRE live web including the long tail; industry headlines like “25% of top sites block GPTBot” measure only large publishers — both are true, they measure different things. Country assignment via ccTLD under-counts .com/.org sites; treat US figures as indicative.

Press contact: press@piperic.com · Data: Piperic Business Intelligence

Every number on this page is reproducible from the public dataset above.

Country reports

🌍 Worldwide🇩🇪 Germany🇷🇺 Russia🇬🇧 United Kingdom🇳🇱 Netherlands🇫🇷 France🇧🇷 Brazil🇨🇭 Switzerland🇯🇵 Japan🇵🇱 Poland🇦🇺 Australia🇸🇪 Sweden🇨🇳 China🇮🇹 Italy🇨🇦 Canada🇨🇿 Czechia🇧🇪 Belgium🇦🇹 Austria🇪🇸 Spain🇮🇳 India🇨🇴 Colombia🇸🇰 Slovakia🇩🇰 Denmark🇭🇺 Hungary🇲🇽 Mexico🇳🇴 Norway🇰🇷 South Korea🇦🇷 Argentina🇳🇿 New Zealand🇫🇮 Finland🇬🇷 Greece🇺🇦 Ukraine🇨🇱 Chile🇿🇦 South Africa🇷🇴 Romania🇻🇳 Vietnam🇹🇷 Turkey🇪🇪 Estonia🇵🇹 Portugal🇹🇼 Taiwan🇮🇪 Ireland🇮🇱 Israel🇮🇩 Indonesia🇱🇹 Lithuania