Sites similar to xolphin.at
Xolphin alternatives & similar sites
Xolphin SSL Certificaten en Digitale Handtekeningen — 18 websites ranked by shared content topics, category and on-page relevance.
Each result shows its full tech stack, contacts and AI-policy — not just a name · Browse all sites in Information and Network Security →
| Domain | Match | Title | Country/Lang | Category | AI files | Contact | AI-protection |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| xolphin.de ↗ | 70* match | Xolphin SSL Zertifikate und Digitale Signaturen | Germany de | Information and Network Security | robots | – | none |
| ak-compliance.de ↗ | 62* match | Digitale Sicherheit und Datenschutz | Althammer & Kill | Germany de | Information and Network SecurityTYPO3 | robots | none | |
| psw-group.de ↗ | 62* match | SSL Verschlüsselung für maximale Sicherheit - PSW GROUP | Germany de | Information and Network SecurityTYPO3 | – | none | |
| abraxas.ch ↗ | 62* match | Für die digitale Schweiz. Mit Sicherheit. | Abraxas Informatik AG | Switzerland de | Information and Network SecurityUmbraco | robots | – | none |
| secunet.com ↗ | 62* match | Schutz digitaler Infrastrukturen | secunet AG | de | Information and Network Security | – | – | none |
| novinet.de ↗ | 62* match | Digitale Lösungen, Datenschutz & IT-Sicherheit aus einer Hand | Germany de | Information and Network Security | robotsllms | – | none |
| comma-soft.com ↗ | 62* match | Comma Soft. Daten. Algorithmen & mehr | Ihr Partner für digitale Transformation | de | Information and Network SecurityWordPress | robotsllms | – | none |
| sslmarket.de ↗ | 62* match | SSL/TLS von dem größten Anbieter Mitteleuropas mit der besten Unterstützung. | Germany de | Information and Network Security | robots | phone | none |
| sslmarket.at ↗ | 62* match | SSL/TLS von dem größten Anbieter Mitteleuropas mit der besten Unterstützung. | Austria de | Information and Network Security | robots | phone | none |
| sslmarket.ch ↗ | 62* match | SSL/TLS von dem größten Anbieter Mitteleuropas mit der besten Unterstützung. | Switzerland de | Information and Network Security | robots | phone | none |
| genua.de ↗ | 62* match | genua - IT Sicherheit für Ihre Digitale Souveränität | Germany de | Information and Network SecurityTYPO3 | robots | emailphone | none |
| reiner-sct.com ↗ | 62* match | REINER SCT - Ihr Experte für digitale Sicherheit | de | Information and Network SecurityWordPress | llms | – | none |
| beyondssl.com ↗ | 62* match | beyond SSL - The Future Of Mobile Work | de | Information and Network SecurityWordPress | robots | emailphone | none |
| safe.wien ↗ | 62* match | SAFE.WIEN – Kobler Network – „Digitale Stabilitätsanalyse 360° – Analyse, Risiko-Bewertung & tragfähige Architektur“ | de | Information and Network SecurityWordPress | robots | – | none |
| sectepe.de ↗ | 62* match | Digitale Souveränität & EU-native IT-Plattformen | SecTepe | Germany de | Information and Network Security | robotsllms | emailphone | none |
| soprasteria.at ↗ | 62* match | Digitale Transformation & Cybersecurity | Sopra Steria Österreich | Austria de | Information and Network Security | – | – | none |
| cryptas.com ↗ | 62* match | CRYPTAS entdecken – Lösungen für digitale Sicherheit | de | Information and Network SecurityHubSpot | robots | none | |
| vsdi.de ↗ | 62* match | Verband Sichere Digitale Identität | Germany de | Information and Network Security | – | – | none |
How the match score works
Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:
- shared topics how many of the same fine‑grained content topics (IAB sub‑categories) both sites cover — the main signal.
- same category whether they sit in the same business / industry category.
- content & title how closely their titles and page descriptions line up in wording and meaning.
No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.