Sites similar to takt.com
Takt alternatives & similar sites
Takt | Brand + Digital Agency | Digital Branding Agency | Vancouver, Toronto & New York — 18 websites ranked by shared content topics, category and on-page relevance.
Each result shows its full tech stack, contacts and AI-policy — not just a name · Browse all sites in Web Design and HTML →
| Domain | Match | Title | Country/Lang | Category | AI files | Contact | AI-protection |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| takt.inc ↗ | 85* match | Takt | Brand + Digital Agency | Digital Branding Agency | Vancouver, Toronto & New York | en | Web Design and HTMLWordPress | robots | none | |
| foxdesign.com.au ↗ | 75* match | FOX DESIGN : creative branding, website design, and digital marketing agency Sydney, Australia | Australia en | Marketing and Advertising | robots | emailphone | none |
| fableco.uk ↗ | 75* match | London Branding, Design & Digital Creative Agency | United Kingdom en | Marketing and AdvertisingWordPress | robots | emailphone | none |
| eightarms.co.uk ↗ | 75* match | Branding and Digital Design Agency | Eight Arms | United Kingdom en | DesignWordPress | robots | – | none |
| marchbranding.com ↗ | 75* match | March | Digital & Branding Agency | London | en | Web Design and HTMLWordPress | robots | emailphone | none |
| limegreentangerine.co.uk ↗ | 70* match | Branding & Design Agency Cardiff | Limegreentangerine | United Kingdom en | DesignPrismic | – | – | none |
| daishocreative.com ↗ | 70* match | Branding & Web Design Agency Miami | Daisho Creative | en | Web Design and HTMLWordPressWooCommerce | – | – | none |
| people-people.com ↗ | 70* match | People People - Seattle-Based Branding and Website Agency | en | Marketing and AdvertisingWordPressWooCommerce | robots | – | none |
| hellojunecreative.co ↗ | 70* match | Hello June Creative | Luxury Web Design & Branding Agency | Colombia en | Marketing and Advertising | – | – | none |
| inklab.com.au ↗ | 70* match | Inklab | Creative agency in Canberra. Branding, Graphic design, Web Design & Development | Australia en | DesignWordPress | robots | emailphone | none |
| designdough.co.uk ↗ | 70* match | designdough | Brand, Graphic & Web Agency | Cardiffdesigndough | Brand & Digital | United Kingdom en | DesignWordPress | robots | emailphone | none |
| openbox9.com ↗ | 70* match | Nonprofit Branding & Website Design Agency | openbox9 | en | Web Design and HTMLWordPress | robotsllms | – | none |
| fortyeight.one ↗ | 70* match | Forty Eight Point One — Brand, Design and Digital Agency | en | DesignSanity | robots | none | |
| deep.co.uk ↗ | 70* match | Creative design agency - branding, websites, design, creative services - Deep | United Kingdom en | DesignWordPress | – | emailphone | none |
| bammedia.ie ↗ | 70* match | Bammedia - Branding Agency | Web Design | Graphic Design | Ireland en | Web Design and HTML | – | emailphone | none |
| dashcreative.com.au ↗ | 70* match | Dashcreative – Melbourne Website Design, Packaging & Branding Agency | Australia en | Web Design and HTMLWordPress | robotsllms | emailphone | none |
| icdesign.co.uk ↗ | 70* match | IC Design London | Creative Agency for Branding, Websites and Design | United Kingdom en | Web Design and HTML | – | none | |
| vavagraphics.com ↗ | 70* match | VAVA Graphics | Charlotte Logo Design, Web Design, And Branding Agency | en | Web Design and HTML | robots | emailphone | none |
How the match score works
Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:
- shared topics how many of the same fine‑grained content topics (IAB sub‑categories) both sites cover — the main signal.
- same category whether they sit in the same business / industry category.
- content & title how closely their titles and page descriptions line up in wording and meaning.
No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.