Sites similar to swgfl.org.uk
Swgfl alternatives & similar sites
Online Safety, Safeguarding, Security and Training | SWGfL — 18 websites ranked by shared content topics, category and on-page relevance.
Each result shows its full tech stack, contacts and AI-policy — not just a name · Browse all sites in Information and Network Security →
| Domain | Match | Title | Country/Lang | Category | AI files | Contact | AI-protection |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| phished.io ↗ | 70* match | Phished | Holistic Training - Security Awareness with Impact | en | Information and Network Security | – | – | none |
| offensive-security.com ↗ | 70* match | Cybersecurity Training & Certifications | OffSec | en | Information and Network SecurityWordPress | robots | – | none |
| crest-approved.org ↗ | 70* match | Cyber Security Services, Accreditations & Training - CREST | en | Information and Network SecurityWordPress | robots | – | none |
| cybeready.com ↗ | 70* match | Cyber Security Awareness Training Platform | CybeReady | en | Information and Network SecurityWordPressWooCommerce | robots | – | none |
| cm-alliance.com ↗ | 70* match | Cyber Security Training and Cybersecurity Consulting UK | en | Information and Network SecurityHubSpot | – | none | |
| pentesterlab.com ↗ | 70* match | Advanced Web Hacking and Security Code Review Training | PentesterLab | en | Information and Network Security | robotsllms | none | |
| hardwear.io ↗ | 70* match | hardwear.io | Hardware Security Conference & Training | Netherlands, Germany & USA | en | Information and Network SecurityWordPress | robots | – | partial · 8 |
| securitybriefing.net ↗ | 70* match | Security Briefing | Cybersecurity News, Security Tools & Online Safety Guides | en | Information and Network SecurityWordPress | robots | – | none |
| schoolsbroadband.co.uk ↗ | 70* match | Broadband Internet, Safeguarding and Security for Schools | United Kingdom en | Information and Network SecurityWordPress | robots | emailphone | none |
| wpguardian.io ↗ | 62* match | Effective Security for WordPress Sites- WPGuardian | en | Information and Network SecurityWordPress | robots | – | none |
| domaintools.com ↗ | 62* match | Threat Intelligence & Domain Security Platform | DomainTools | en | Information and Network Security | – | none | |
| eset.com ↗ | 62* match | ESET Cybersecurity | Enterprise, Business and Home Solutions | ESET | en | Information and Network SecurityTYPO3 | – | – | none |
| fortinet.com ↗ | 62* match | Global Leader of Cybersecurity Solutions and Services | Fortinet | en | Information and Network SecurityAdobe Experience Manager | – | – | none |
| sitelock.com ↗ | 62* match | Website Security Monitoring & Malware Protection | SiteLock | en | Information and Network Security | – | phone | none |
| owasp.org ↗ | 62* match | OWASP Foundation, the Open Source Foundation for Application Security | OWASP Foundation | en | Information and Network Security | robots | – | none |
| securitymetrics.com ↗ | 62* match | PCI | HIPAA | Credit Card Compliance | SecurityMetrics | en | Information and Network Security | – | none | |
| coram.ai ↗ | 62* match | Coram: Unified Physical Security Platform | en | Information and Network Security | – | – | none |
| webnamescorporate.com ↗ | 62* match | Webnames Corporate | Domain Management, Brand Security, DNS & SSL | en | Information and Network SecurityWordPress | robotsllms | emailphone | none |
How the match score works
Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:
- shared topics how many of the same fine‑grained content topics (IAB sub‑categories) both sites cover — the main signal.
- same category whether they sit in the same business / industry category.
- content & title how closely their titles and page descriptions line up in wording and meaning.
No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.