Sites similar to stonewall.org.uk
Stonewall alternatives & similar sites
The leading charity supporting LGBTQ+ communities in… | Stonewall UK — 18 websites ranked by shared content topics, category and on-page relevance.
Each result shows its full tech stack, contacts and AI-policy — not just a name · Browse all sites in Non Profit Organizations →
| Domain | Match | Title | Country/Lang | Category | AI files | Contact | AI-protection |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| oxfam.org.uk ↗ | 67* match | Oxfam GB | leading UK charity fighting global poverty | United Kingdom en | Non Profit Organizations | – | – | none |
| azfoundation.org ↗ | 67* match | Supporting Arizona communities through charitable giving | en | Non Profit OrganizationsWordPress | robots | – | none |
| unitedway.ca ↗ | 67* match | United Way Centraide Canada - Supporting Communities Across Canada | Canada en | Non Profit OrganizationsWordPress | – | – | none |
| surdna.org ↗ | 67* match | Supporting Just and Sustainable Communities - Surdna Foundation | en | Non Profit OrganizationsWordPress | robots | phone | none |
| mainlandfoundation.co.nz ↗ | 67* match | Mainland Foundation | Supporting Communities | New Zealand en | Non Profit OrganizationsWordPressWooCommerce | robots | none | |
| nea.org.uk ↗ | 67* match | National Energy Action (NEA) - the UK's leading fuel poverty charity | United Kingdom en | Non Profit OrganizationsWordPress | robots | phone | none |
| helpster.charity ↗ | 67* match | Helpster Charity – EU Nonprofit Supporting Children in Need | en | Non Profit Organizations | robots | none | |
| charitynavigator.org ↗ | 61* match | Charity Ratings and Donor Resources | Charity Navigator | en | Non Profit OrganizationsAdobe Experience Manager | robots | – | none |
| amtamassage.org ↗ | 61* match | American Massage Therapy Association (AMTA) | The Leading Nonprofit for Massage Therapists | United States~ en | Non Profit Organizations | – | emailphone | none |
| give.org ↗ | 61* match | Find Best Charities To Donate | Charity Ratings, Reviews | en | Non Profit OrganizationsWordPress | – | none | |
| woundedwarriorproject.org ↗ | 61* match | Veterans Charity - Non Profit Organization for Veterans | United States~ en | Non Profit Organizations | – | – | none |
| chuffed.org ↗ | 61* match | Chuffed | Non-profit charity and social enterprise fundraising | en | Non Profit Organizations | robots | none | |
| idonate.ie ↗ | 61* match | iDonate | Charity Fundraising Ireland — GoFundMe Alternative | Ireland en | Non Profit Organizations | – | phone | none |
| otf.ca ↗ | 61* match | Ontario Trillium Foundation | Building Healthy and Vibrant Communities Across Ontario | Canada en | Non Profit OrganizationsDrupal | robots | – | none |
| e-voice.org.uk ↗ | 61* match | Voice Online Communities | Free Website Builder | United Kingdom en | Non Profit Organizations | robots | – | none |
| guaranteedirish.ie ↗ | 61* match | Guaranteed Irish | Supporting Business that Supports Ireland | Ireland en | Non Profit OrganizationsWordPress | robots | phone | partial · 8 |
| greatergood.com ↗ | 61* match | GreaterGood® | Supporting People, Pets, and the Planet | en | Non Profit OrganizationsShopify | robotsllms | – | none |
| ymca.org ↗ | 61* match | YMCA of the USA | Building Stronger Communities and Brighter Futures | en | Non Profit OrganizationsDrupal | – | – | none |
How the match score works
Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:
- shared topics how many of the same fine‑grained content topics (IAB sub‑categories) both sites cover — the main signal.
- same category whether they sit in the same business / industry category.
- content & title how closely their titles and page descriptions line up in wording and meaning.
No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.