Sites similar to sansec.io
Sansec alternatives & similar sites
Sansec - experts in eCommerce security — 18 websites ranked by shared content topics, category and on-page relevance.
Each result shows its full tech stack, contacts and AI-policy — not just a name · Browse all sites in Information and Network Security →
| Domain | Match | Title | Country/Lang | Category | AI files | Contact | AI-protection |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| blacknight.com ↗ | 100* match | Irish & European Website, Cloud, Email & Rackspace Hosting, Domain Registration, Dedicated Servers Ireland | en | Web HostingWordPress | – | emailphone | none |
| covertswarm.com ↗ | 75* match | Offensive Cybersecurity Experts - CovertSwarm | en | Information and Network SecurityWordPress | – | phone | none |
| insightassurance.com ↗ | 75* match | Insight Assurance | Cybersecurity & Compliance Experts | en | Information and Network SecurityWordPress | robots | phone | none |
| dionach.com ↗ | 75* match | Global Information Security Experts - Dionach | en | Information and Network SecurityWordPressWooCommerce | robots | – | full · 12 |
| eye.security ↗ | 75* match | Cutting-edge AI Security. Guided by Europe's Leading Experts. | en | Information and Network SecurityHubSpot | robots | – | none |
| truesec.com ↗ | 75* match | Truesec - Experts in Cybersecurity | en | Information and Network SecurityWordPress | robots | emailphone | none |
| pangiam.com ↗ | 75* match | PANGIAM - Security Experts. Technologists. Problem Solvers. | en | Information and Network SecurityWordPress | robots | – | none |
| wpguardian.io ↗ | 65* match | Effective Security for WordPress Sites- WPGuardian | en | Information and Network SecurityWordPress | robots | – | none |
| domaintools.com ↗ | 65* match | Threat Intelligence & Domain Security Platform | DomainTools | en | Information and Network Security | – | none | |
| eset.com ↗ | 65* match | ESET Cybersecurity | Enterprise, Business and Home Solutions | ESET | en | Information and Network SecurityTYPO3 | – | – | none |
| fortinet.com ↗ | 65* match | Global Leader of Cybersecurity Solutions and Services | Fortinet | en | Information and Network SecurityAdobe Experience Manager | – | – | none |
| owasp.org ↗ | 65* match | OWASP Foundation, the Open Source Foundation for Application Security | OWASP Foundation | en | Information and Network Security | robots | – | none |
| sitelock.com ↗ | 65* match | Website Security Monitoring & Malware Protection | SiteLock | en | Information and Network Security | – | phone | none |
| securitymetrics.com ↗ | 65* match | PCI | HIPAA | Credit Card Compliance | SecurityMetrics | en | Information and Network Security | – | none | |
| webnamescorporate.com ↗ | 65* match | Webnames Corporate | Domain Management, Brand Security, DNS & SSL | en | Information and Network SecurityWordPress | robotsllms | emailphone | none |
| coram.ai ↗ | 65* match | Coram: Unified Physical Security Platform | en | Information and Network Security | – | – | none |
| acronis.com ↗ | 65* match | AI-Powered Cybersecurity, Data Protection & IT Automation | Acronis | United States~ en | Information and Network Security | – | phone | none |
| cscdbs.com ↗ | 65* match | CSC | The Most Security Conscious Domains Provider | CSC | en | Information and Network Security | – | – | none |
How the match score works
Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:
- shared topics how many of the same fine‑grained content topics (IAB sub‑categories) both sites cover — the main signal.
- same category whether they sit in the same business / industry category.
- content & title how closely their titles and page descriptions line up in wording and meaning.
No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.