Sites similar to prefix.dev
Prefix alternatives & similar sites
prefix.dev – solving software package management — 18 websites ranked by shared content topics, category and on-page relevance.
Each result shows its full tech stack, contacts and AI-policy — not just a name · Browse all sites in Technology and Computing →
| Domain | Match | Title | Country/Lang | Category | AI files | Contact | AI-protection |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| gitea.dev ↗ | 73* match | GitHub - go-gitea/gitea: Git with a cup of tea! Painless self-hosted all-in-one software development service, including Git hosting, code review, team collaboration, package registry and CI/CD · GitHub | en | Software and Applications | robots | partial · 8 | |
| nesbitt.io ↗ | 73* match | Andrew Nesbitt | Software Engineer and Package Management Nerd | en | Technology and Computing | robotsllmshumans | none | |
| sourceforge.net ↗ | 67* match | Compare B2B Software, Download, & Develop Open Source & Business Software - SourceForge | United States~ en | Software and Applications | robotsllms | – | none |
| sf.net ↗ | 67* match | Compare B2B Software, Download, & Develop Open Source & Business Software - SourceForge | United States~ en | Software and Applications | robotsllms | – | none |
| agilemanifesto.org ↗ | 67* match | Manifesto for Agile Software Development | en | Software and Applications | – | – | none |
| qt.io ↗ | 67* match | Qt | Tools for Each Stage of Software Development Lifecycle | Finland~ en | Software and ApplicationsHubSpot | – | – | none |
| sourceforge.io ↗ | 67* match | Compare B2B Software, Download, & Develop Open Source & Business Software - SourceForge | United States~ en | Software and Applications | – | – | none |
| perforce.com ↗ | 67* match | Enterprise DevOps Tools | Perforce Software | en | Software and ApplicationsDrupal | – | – | none |
| appsytools.com ↗ | 67* match | Software Tools for Work, Design, Marketing, and Development - Appsy Tools (2026) | en | Software and Applications | robots | – | none |
| jfrog.com ↗ | 67* match | Software Supply Chain Solutions for DevOps & Security | JFrog | en | Software and ApplicationsWordPress | robotsllms | – | none |
| herodevs.com ↗ | 67* match | Never-Ending Support for Deprecated Open Source Software | HeroDevs | United States~ en | Software and Applications | – | emailphone | none |
| jfrog.io ↗ | 67* match | Software Supply Chain Solutions for DevOps & Security | JFrog | en | Software and ApplicationsWordPress | – | – | none |
| se-radio.net ↗ | 67* match | Software Engineering Radio – The Podcast for Professional Software Developers | en | Technology and ComputingWordPress | robots | – | none |
| nader.mx ↗ | 67* match | John Nader - Software Developer | Mexico en | Technology and Computing | – | – | none |
| platformio.org ↗ | 67* match | Your Gateway to Embedded Software Development Excellence · PlatformIO | en | Technology and Computing | robots | – | none |
| fsdn.com ↗ | 67* match | Compare B2B Software, Download, & Develop Open Source & Business Software - SourceForge | United States~ en | Software and Applications | robots | – | none |
| audienceinsights.net ↗ | 67* match | audienceinsights.net - The blog about mobile software development | en | Technology and ComputingWordPressWooCommerce | robots | – | none |
| wapice.com ↗ | 67* match | Software development with end-to-end competence | Wapice | en | Software and ApplicationsWordPressReaction Commerce | robots | – | none |
How the match score works
Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:
- shared topics how many of the same fine‑grained content topics (IAB sub‑categories) both sites cover — the main signal.
- same category whether they sit in the same business / industry category.
- content & title how closely their titles and page descriptions line up in wording and meaning.
No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.