Sites similar to netfoundrynetwork.com
Netfoundrynetwork alternatives & similar sites
Open-Source Zero-Trust Workload Connectivity | NetFoundry — 18 websites ranked by shared content topics, category and on-page relevance.
Each result shows its full tech stack, contacts and AI-policy — not just a name · Browse all sites in Information and Network Security →
| Domain | Match | Title | Country/Lang | Category | AI files | Contact | AI-protection |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| netfoundry.io ↗ | 85* match | Open-Source Zero-Trust Workload Connectivity | NetFoundry | en | Information and Network SecurityWordPress | robotsllms | emailphone | none |
| pfsense.org ↗ | 70* match | pfSense® - World's Most Trusted Open Source Firewall | en | Information and Network Security | robots | – | none |
| chainguard.dev ↗ | 70* match | The trusted source for open source | Chainguard | en | Information and Network Security | – | – | none |
| owasp.org ↗ | 65* match | OWASP Foundation, the Open Source Foundation for Application Security | OWASP Foundation | en | Information and Network Security | robots | – | none |
| bunkerweb.io ↗ | 65* match | BunkerWeb - The open-source Web Application Firewall (WAF) | en | Information and Network SecurityWordPress | – | none | |
| opnsense.org ↗ | 65* match | OPNsense® is an open source, feature rich firewall and routing platform, offering cutting-edge network protection. - OPNsense | en | Information and Network SecurityWordPress | robots | none | |
| openssf.org ↗ | 65* match | Open Source Security Foundation – Linux Foundation Projects | en | Information and Network SecurityWordPress | robots | – | none |
| ostif.org ↗ | 65* match | OSTIF.org – Securing Open Source for the World | en | Information and Network SecurityWordPressWooCommerce | robots | – | none |
| backbox.org ↗ | 65* match | BackBox.org – A Free Open Source Community Project | en | Information and Network SecurityWordPress | – | – | none |
| osv.dev ↗ | 65* match | OSV - Open Source Vulnerabilities | en | Information and Network Security | robots | – | none |
| cryptomator.org ↗ | 65* match | Cryptomator - Free & Open-Source Cloud Storage Encryption | en | Information and Network Security | robots | – | none |
| misp-project.org ↗ | 65* match | MISP Open Source Threat Intelligence Platform & Open Standards For Threat Intelligence Sharing | en | Information and Network Security | – | none | |
| arnaert.com ↗ | 65* match | Arnaert IT Security and Genealogy : open source solutions | en | Information and Network Security | robots | – | none |
| coreinfrastructure.org ↗ | 65* match | Open Source Security Foundation – Linux Foundation Projects | en | Information and Network SecurityWordPress | – | – | none |
| orcwg.org ↗ | 65* match | Leading Regulatory Compliance for Open Source | Open Regulatory Compliance Working Group | en | Information and Network Security | robots | – | none |
| trustarc.com ↗ | 60* match | Data Privacy Management Software & Solutions | TrustArc | United States~ en | Information and Network SecurityWordPress | robots | phone | none |
| truste.com ↗ | 60* match | Data Privacy Management Software & Solutions | TrustArc | United States~ en | Information and Network SecurityWordPress | robots | phone | none |
| openpgp.org ↗ | 60* match | OpenPGP - OpenPGP | en | Information and Network Security | – | – | none |
How the match score works
Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:
- shared topics how many of the same fine‑grained content topics (IAB sub‑categories) both sites cover — the main signal.
- same category whether they sit in the same business / industry category.
- content & title how closely their titles and page descriptions line up in wording and meaning.
No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.