Sites similar to luarocks.org
Luarocks alternatives & similar sites
LuaRocks - The Lua package manager — 18 websites ranked by shared content topics, category and on-page relevance.
Each result shows its full tech stack, contacts and AI-policy — not just a name · Browse all sites in Software and Applications →
| Domain | Match | Title | Country/Lang | Category | AI files | Contact | AI-protection |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| brew.sh ↗ | 75* match | Homebrew: The Package Manager for Everywhere | en | Software and Applications | robots | – | none |
| chocolatey.org ↗ | 75* match | Chocolatey Software | Chocolatey - The package manager for Windows | en | Software and Applications | robots | – | partial · 8 |
| packagecontrol.io ↗ | 75* match | Package Control - the Sublime Text package manager | en | Software and Applications | robots | none | |
| conan.io ↗ | 75* match | Conan — Homepage - Conan 2.0: C and C++ Open Source Package Manager | en | Software and Applications | – | – | none |
| snapcraft.io ↗ | 65* match | Snapcraft - Snaps are universal Linux packages | en | Software and Applications | robots | – | none |
| booking-manager.com ↗ | 65* match | Yacht Charter Online Booking System and Management Software - Booking Manager | en | Software and Applications | – | none | |
| softaculous.com ↗ | 65* match | Softaculous – Apps and WordPress Manager | en | Software and Applications | robots | – | none |
| listmonk.app ↗ | 65* match | listmonk - Free and open source self-hosted newsletter, mailing list manager, and transactional mails | en | Software and Applications | – | – | none |
| gensolve.com ↗ | 65* match | Gensolve Practice Manager New Zealand | Including ACC Electronic Billing | en | Software and ApplicationsWordPress | robots | – | none |
| easeus.com ↗ | 65* match | EaseUS Software | Data Recovery, Backup, Partition Manager, Data Transfer, Video Editor and Recorder. | China~ en | Software and Applications | – | – | none |
| gtmtools.com ↗ | 65* match | GTM Tools - enhanced Google Tag Manager utilities | en | Software and Applications | – | none | |
| apogeeinvent.com ↗ | 65* match | Custom Software Development, E-Commerce Websites, Website Sales & Marketing Software, MLM Software Solutions. Custom Multi-Level Marketing Software, Pre-Built MLM Commissioning Software, Compensation MLM Website Packages, Quality Software Programming, Custom Architected Software Platform Engineering | en | Software and Applications | robots | emailphone | none |
| glampmanager.com ↗ | 65* match | GlampManager | Booking and management software | en | Software and Applications | – | – | none |
| internetdownloadmanager.com ↗ | 65* match | Internet Download Manager is a powerful download accelerator | en | Software and Applications | robots | – | none |
| desk.ms ↗ | 65* match | Desk Manager | Software Help Desk e Service Desk | en | Software and Applications | – | – | none |
| pythonhosted.org ↗ | 65* match | PyPI Package and Documentation Storage | en | Software and Applications | – | – | none |
| propertyme.com.au ↗ | 65* match | PropertyMe - Online Property Management Software & Trust Accounting Applications, Accounting Systems In the Cloud for Property Managers in Australia | Australia en | Software and ApplicationsWordPressSpree Commerce | robots | – | none |
| vrmgr.com ↗ | 65* match | Complete Vacation Rental Management Software | Virtual Resort Manager | en | Software and Applications | robots | – | none |
How the match score works
Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:
- shared topics how many of the same fine‑grained content topics (IAB sub‑categories) both sites cover — the main signal.
- same category whether they sit in the same business / industry category.
- content & title how closely their titles and page descriptions line up in wording and meaning.
No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.