Sites similar to inpakta.eus
Inpakta alternatives & similar sites
InpAkta – Inpaktu sozialerako ikerlanen akta / Journal of research for social impact — 18 websites ranked by shared content topics, category and on-page relevance.
Each result shows its full tech stack, contacts and AI-policy — not just a name · Browse all sites in Non Profit Organizations →
| Domain | Match | Title | Country/Lang | Category | AI files | Contact | AI-protection |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| youngfoundation.org ↗ | 65* match | The Young Foundation – Shaping a fairer future – We are the UK’s home for community research and social innovation | en | Non Profit OrganizationsWordPress | robots | – | none |
| candid.org ↗ | 60* match | Research nonprofits, funders, and grants | Candid | en | Non Profit OrganizationsWordPress | robotsllms | none | |
| thecvf.com ↗ | 60* match | The Computer Vision Foundation – A non-profit organization that fosters and supports research in all aspects of computer vision | en | Non Profit OrganizationsWordPress | – | – | none |
| chuffed.org ↗ | 60* match | Chuffed | Non-profit charity and social enterprise fundraising | en | Non Profit Organizations | robots | none | |
| afhdr.org ↗ | 60* match | Home - AFHDR | Human Rights & Development Research Association | en | Non Profit OrganizationsWordPress | robots | – | none |
| ssir.org ↗ | 60* match | Stanford Social Innovation Review: Informing and Inspiring Leaders of Social Change | en | Non Profit Organizations | robots | – | none |
| nesta.org.uk ↗ | 60* match | Nesta | UK innovation agency for social good | United Kingdom en | Non Profit Organizations | robots | – | none |
| fundacionmapfre.org ↗ | 60* match | Compromiso social | Fundación Mapfre | es | Non Profit OrganizationsWordPress | – | none | |
| socialenterprise.org.uk ↗ | 60* match | Home | Social Enterprise UK | United Kingdom en | Non Profit OrganizationsWordPress | – | – | none |
| startsocial.de ↗ | 60* match | Startseite - startsocial e.V. | Germany de | Non Profit OrganizationsWordPress | robots | emailphone | none |
| ror.org ↗ | 60* match | Research Organization Registry (ROR) | Home | en | Non Profit Organizations | robots | none | |
| ivar.org.uk ↗ | 60* match | Home - Research Charity - IVAR UK | United Kingdom en | Non Profit OrganizationsWordPress | – | none | |
| cemefi.org ↗ | 60* match | Centro Mexicano para la Filantropía – El Centro Mexicano para la Filantropía (Cemefi) es un espacio de encuentro, diálogo y colaboración que reúne a organizaciones de la sociedad civil, empresas socialmente responsables y personas comprometidas con una visión común: fortalecer la filant | es | Non Profit OrganizationsWordPress | – | none | |
| social-enterprise.nl ↗ | 60* match | Social Enterprise NL | Netherlands nl | Non Profit OrganizationsWordPressWooCommerce | robots | none | |
| socialgoodfund.org ↗ | 60* match | SocialGood-Let's Build the World We Wish to See | en | Non Profit OrganizationsWordPress | – | – | none |
| social-current.org ↗ | 60* match | Social Current | Activating the Power of the Social Sector | en | Non Profit OrganizationsWordPress | robots | – | none |
| ondiversity.com ↗ | 60* match | Diversity in Organizations, Communities & Nations Research Network | United States~ en | Non Profit Organizations | – | none | |
| olatukoop.eus ↗ | 28* match | Ekonomia eta lurralde eraldatzaileen errizoma • Olatukoop | eu | Non Profit OrganizationsWordPressWooCommerce | robots | emailphone | none |
How the match score works
Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:
- shared topics how many of the same fine‑grained content topics (IAB sub‑categories) both sites cover — the main signal.
- same category whether they sit in the same business / industry category.
- content & title how closely their titles and page descriptions line up in wording and meaning.
No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.