Sites similar to hacked.fr
Hacked alternatives & similar sites
🔐 Domaines Abusifs - Le radar des abus numériques par noms de domaine : phishing, usurpation d'identité — 18 websites ranked by shared content topics, category and on-page relevance.
Each result shows its full tech stack, contacts and AI-policy — not just a name · Browse all sites in Information and Network Security →
| Domain | Match | Title | Country/Lang | Category | AI files | Contact | AI-protection |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| fic2010.fr ↗ | 47* match | usurpation identite: Modèles de lettres pour Usurpation identite - Le Monde.fr (article) | France fr | Spam or Harmful Content | robots | none | |
| domainoo.com ↗ | 38* match | DOMAINOO : Nom de domaine - La protection de votre Identité sur Internet | fr | Information and Network Security | – | none | |
| nameshield.com ↗ | 32* match | Nameshield - Sécurisation de vos noms de domaine stratégiques | fr | Information and Network SecurityWordPress | – | – | none |
| solidnames.fr ↗ | 32* match | Solidnames - Noms de domaine : Surveillance, Gestion et Récupération (rachat, backorder) - Solidnames | France fr | Information and Network SecurityWordPress | robots | phone | none |
| monidenum.fr ↗ | 32* match | MonIdenum | L’identité numérique gratuite et sécurisée pour accéder à vos services en ligne | France fr | Information and Network Security | – | – | none |
| nameshield.net ↗ | 32* match | Nameshield - Sécurisation de vos noms de domaine stratégiques | fr | Information and Network SecurityWordPress | robots | – | none |
| kaspersky.fr ↗ | 28* match | Solutions de cybersécurité Kaspersky pour particuliers et entreprises | Kaspersky | France fr | Information and Network Security | – | – | none |
| certidemat.com ↗ | 28* match | certidemat - Certificat électronique eIDAS / RGS | fr | Information and Network Security | – | none | |
| mailinblack.com ↗ | 28* match | La cybersécurité centrée sur l'utilisateur - Mailinblack | France~ fr | Information and Network SecurityWordPress | robots | – | none |
| japac.fr ↗ | 28* match | Blog | A blog about different stuff all around | France fr | Spam or Harmful Content | – | none | |
| kaspersky.be ↗ | 28* match | Solutions de cybersécurité Kaspersky pour particuliers et entreprises | Kaspersky | Belgium fr | Information and Network Security | – | – | none |
| kaspersky.ma ↗ | 28* match | Solutions de cybersécurité pour particuliers et entreprises | Kaspersky | Morocco fr | Information and Network Security | – | – | none |
| wa-market.com ↗ | 28* match | Wa market - Les pros du logiciels | fr | Information and Network SecurityWordPress | – | – | none |
| docaposte.com ↗ | 28* match | Docaposte, Leader de la confiance numérique | fr | Information and Network SecurityWordPress | robots | – | none |
| forescout.fr ↗ | 28* match | Forescout Technologies - Gérez les cyber-risques et atténuez les menaces en continu. | France fr | Information and Network SecurityWordPress | robots | – | none |
| cybershield-waf.com ↗ | 28* match | CyberShield WAF - Protection Avancée des Applications Web | fr | Information and Network Security | – | – | none |
| cyber-safe.ch ↗ | 28* match | Cyber-Safe – Le Label Suisse de Cybersécurité | Switzerland fr | Information and Network SecurityWordPressWooCommerce | robots | none | |
| campuscyber.fr ↗ | 28* match | Ensemble, au service d'une grande nation cyber. | France fr | Information and Network SecurityWordPress | – | – | none |
How the match score works
Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:
- shared topics how many of the same fine‑grained content topics (IAB sub‑categories) both sites cover — the main signal.
- same category whether they sit in the same business / industry category.
- content & title how closely their titles and page descriptions line up in wording and meaning.
No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.