similar sites

Browse

Pricing AI Report

Tools

🚀Submit Your Site to AIPush your URL to AI search engines 🛰️AI Bot ObservatoryEvery AI crawler & who blocks it 📇AI Crawler Database900+ AI user agents + robots.txt gen ⚖️AI Crawler ComparisonCompare two AI crawlers head-to-head 💰AI Licensing / Pay-Per-CrawlWho can charge AI crawlers — Pay-Per-Crawl 🎛️AI Robots.txt Policy BuilderGoal-based robots.txt (cite me, don't train)🤖AI Crawler CheckerSee which AI bots your site blocks 🎯AI Readiness CheckerScore your site 0–100 for AI 🔗Backlink CheckerWho links to any site — free All tools →

Browse free →

Sites similar to gnf.jp

Gnf alternatives & similar sites

NPO法人国際ファシリテーション協会 — 18 websites ranked by shared content topics, category and on-page relevance.

Each result shows its full tech stack, contacts and AI-policy — not just a name · Browse all sites in Vocational Training →

Domain	Match	Title	Country/Lang	Category	AI files	Contact	AI-protection
tsuki-kango.com ↗	68 match 1 shared topics	つき訪問看護ステーション	ja	vocational-training WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
medical-career.net ↗	67 match 1 shared topics	田之頭智子 – 国際コーチング連盟プロフェッショナル・サーティファイドコーチ \| 日本アンガーマネジメント協会ファシリテーター	ja	vocational-training WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
bodyschoolsakura.site ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	名古屋リラクゼーションスクール桜塾	ja	vocational-training	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
cs-kentei.net ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	一般社団法人ＣＳスペシャリスト検定協会	ja	vocational-training	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
tsukubadronestation.com ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	TSUKUBA DRONE STATION｜つくばドローンステーション｜ドローンスクール	ja	vocational-training WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
janssl.org ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	janssl3 \| 第３回日本看護シミュレーションラーニング学会学術集会 \| janssl3	ja	vocational-training	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
japan-sns-association.com ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	一般社団法人日本SNS協会	ja	vocational-training WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
ace-ikusei.com ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	エース育成システム	ja	vocational-training	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
kuwano-mai.com ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	桑野麻衣Official Site｜コミュニケーション・マナー・人材育成	ja	vocational-training WordPress	robots llmsaihumans	emailphone	none
anacari.work ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	日本アナウンサーキャリア協会	ja	vocational-training WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
jca-okinawa.org ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	日本クレーン協会沖縄県支部 - jca-okinawa.org	ja	vocational-training WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
kyotocoach.com ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	京都企業コーチング \| コミュニケーション研修｜アドラー心理学	ja	vocational-training WordPress	robots llmsaihumans	email phone	none
japan-sca.org ↗	63 match 1 shared topics	一般社団法人　日本能力認定協会	ja	vocational-training WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
1st-stroke.com ↗	63 match 1 shared topics	First Stroke （ファーストストローク）	ja	vocational-training WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
jba-ishikawa.org ↗	63 match 1 shared topics	一般社団法人日本ボイラ協会石川支部	ja	vocational-training WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
jba-toyama.org ↗	63 match 1 shared topics	一般社団法人日本ボイラ協会富山支部	ja	vocational-training	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
jba-kanagawa.org ↗	63 match 1 shared topics	一般社団法人日本ボイラ協会　神奈川支部（公式ホームページ）	ja	vocational-training	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
japanclinical-cta.org ↗	63 match 1 shared topics	JCTA｜一般社団法人日本臨床化粧療法士協会	ja	vocational-training WordPress	robots llmsaihumans	emailphone	none

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

shared topics how many of the same fine‑grained content topics (IAB sub‑categories) both sites cover — the main signal.
same category whether they sit in the same business / industry category.
content & title how closely their titles and page descriptions line up in wording and meaning.

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.