Sites similar to globalcma.org
Globalcma alternatives & similar sites
CMA International Foundation | The World is Our Family™ — 18 websites ranked by shared content topics, category and on-page relevance.
Each result shows its full tech stack, contacts and AI-policy — not just a name · Browse all sites in Non Profit Organizations →
| Domain | Match | Title | Country/Lang | Category | AI files | Contact | AI-protection |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| wvi.org ↗ | 67* match | About World Vision | HomePage | World Vision International | en | Non Profit OrganizationsDrupal | – | – | none |
| oakfnd.org ↗ | 67* match | Oak Foundation - Through our grant-making, we support others to make the world a safer, fairer, and more sustainable place to live. | en | Non Profit OrganizationsWordPress | – | – | none |
| newhorizonsfoundation.com ↗ | 67* match | New Horizons Foundation – Partnering Together For World Impact | en | Non Profit OrganizationsWordPress | robots | none | |
| concern.net ↗ | 67* match | Concern Worldwide | International humanitarian & development organisation | en | Non Profit OrganizationsDrupal | robots | phone | none |
| fit-ift.org ↗ | 67* match | International Federation of Translators – The voice of associations of translators, interpreters and terminologists around the world | en | Non Profit OrganizationsWordPress | – | – | none |
| savingcranes.org ↗ | 67* match | Home - International Crane Foundation | en | Non Profit OrganizationsWordPressWooCommerce | robots | emailphone | none |
| blankfoundation.org ↗ | 67* match | Arthur M. Blank Family Foundation | Atlanta, Georgia | Home | en | Non Profit OrganizationsWordPress | robots | – | none |
| worldanimalprotection.org ↗ | 67* match | World Animal Protection International | End Animal Cruelty | en | Non Profit Organizations | – | none | |
| segalfamilyfoundation.org ↗ | 67* match | Segal Family Foundation: Trust-Based Philanthropy in Africa | en | Non Profit OrganizationsWordPressWooCommerce | robots | – | none |
| jxgivesbackfamilyfoundation.org ↗ | 67* match | JX Gives Back Family Foundation | | en | Non Profit OrganizationsWordPressWooCommerce | robots | emailphone | none |
| 2025.coop ↗ | 67* match | UN International Year of Cooperatives 2025 – Cooperatives for a Better World | en | Non Profit OrganizationsWordPress | robots | none | |
| blavatnikfoundation.org ↗ | 67* match | BLAVATNIK FAMILY FOUNDATION - Blavatnik Family Foundation | en | Non Profit OrganizationsWordPress | robots | – | none |
| gbs-cidp.org ↗ | 67* match | Home - GBS | CIDP Foundation International | en | Non Profit OrganizationsWordPressWooCommerce | – | – | none |
| icfdn.org ↗ | 67* match | International Community Foundation | Non Profit Organization | en | Non Profit OrganizationsWordPress | robots | emailphone | none |
| ukrainianworldcongress.org ↗ | 67* match | Ukrainian World Congress: International Organization | en | Non Profit OrganizationsWordPress | robots | phone | none |
| wearefamilyfoundation.org ↗ | 67* match | We Are Family Foundation | en | Non Profit OrganizationsSquarespace | robots | emailphone | none |
| apache.org ↗ | 61* match | Welcome to The Apache Software Foundation | Apache Software Foundation | en | Non Profit Organizations | robots | – | none |
| wikimediafoundation.org ↗ | 61* match | Home – Wikimedia Foundation | en | Non Profit OrganizationsWordPress | robots | – | none |
How the match score works
Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:
- shared topics how many of the same fine‑grained content topics (IAB sub‑categories) both sites cover — the main signal.
- same category whether they sit in the same business / industry category.
- content & title how closely their titles and page descriptions line up in wording and meaning.
No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.