Sites similar to gitgoat.tools
Gitgoat alternatives & similar sites
GitGoat | GitGoat is an open source tool that was built to enable DevOps and Engineering teams to design and implement a sustainable misconfiguration prevention strategy. It can be used to test products with access to GitHub repositories without a risk to your production environment. — 18 websites ranked by shared content topics, category and on-page relevance.
Each result shows its full tech stack, contacts and AI-policy — not just a name · Browse all sites in Software and Applications →
| Domain | Match | Title | Country/Lang | Category | AI files | Contact | AI-protection |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| payara.fish ↗ | 60* match | Payara Services: Platform Engineering for Enterprise Java | en | Software and ApplicationsWordPress | – | none | |
| openvalue.eu ↗ | 60* match | OpenValue - Better Software, Faster. Premium Software Engineering. | European Union en | Technology and Computing | – | – | none |
| se-radio.net ↗ | 60* match | Software Engineering Radio – The Podcast for Professional Software Developers | en | Technology and ComputingWordPress | robots | – | none |
| virtuslab.com ↗ | 60* match | VirtusLab | Software Consulting & Engineering | Poland~ en | Software and Applications | robotsllms | none | |
| ghidra-sre.org ↗ | 60* match | GitHub - NationalSecurityAgency/ghidra: Ghidra is a software reverse engineering (SRE) framework · GitHub | en | Software and Applications | – | – | none |
| techsoft3d.com ↗ | 60* match | Tech Soft 3D | Building Leading Engineering Applications with Developers and Businesses | en | Technology and ComputingStoryblok | robotsllms | – | none |
| sigsoft.org ↗ | 60* match | The ACM Special Interest Group on Software Engineering | en | Technology and Computing | robots | – | none |
| myget.org ↗ | 60* match | Package Management for Private & Public Feeds & Repositories | MyGet | en | Software and Applications | robots | – | none |
| github.com ↗ | 55* match | GitHub · Change is constant. GitHub keeps you ahead. · GitHub | en | Software and Applications | robotsllms | – | none |
| addtoany.com ↗ | 55* match | AddToAny: Share Buttons by the Universal Sharing Platform | en | Technology and Computing | – | – | none |
| tally.so ↗ | 55* match | Tally - Create Beautiful Forms for Free | Unlimited Forms & Submissions | en | Software and Applications | robotsllms | none | |
| sourceforge.net ↗ | 55* match | Compare B2B Software, Download, & Develop Open Source & Business Software - SourceForge | United States~ en | Software and Applications | robotsllms | – | none |
| wufoo.com ↗ | 55* match | Online Form Builder with Cloud Storage Database | Wufoo | en | Technology and ComputingWordPress | – | – | none |
| atlassian.net ↗ | 55* match | Products | Atlassian | en | Technology and Computing | robots | – | none |
| docker.com ↗ | 55* match | Docker: Accelerated Container Application Development | en | Software and ApplicationsWordPress | – | – | none |
| onelink.to ↗ | 55* match | Onelink.to - One link or QR code to App Store and Google Play | en | Software and Applications | robots | none | |
| formstack.com ↗ | 55* match | Secure and Easy-to-use Forms, Docs & eSignatures | Formstack | en | Software and Applications | – | – | none |
| getgrav.org ↗ | 55* match | Grav - A Modern Flat-File CMS | Grav CMS | en | Technology and ComputingGrav | – | – | none |
How the match score works
Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:
- shared topics how many of the same fine‑grained content topics (IAB sub‑categories) both sites cover — the main signal.
- same category whether they sit in the same business / industry category.
- content & title how closely their titles and page descriptions line up in wording and meaning.
No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.