Sites similar to geschwindigkeit.de
Geschwindigkeit alternatives & similar sites
Internet Speed Test - speedmeter - www.geschwindigkeit.de — 18 websites ranked by shared content topics, category and on-page relevance.
Each result shows its full tech stack, contacts and AI-policy — not just a name · Browse all sites in Internet Service Providers →
| Domain | Match | Title | Country/Lang | Category | AI files | Contact | AI-protection |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| dokom21.de ↗ | 67* match | DOKOM21: High-Speed-Internet für Dortmund | Germany de | Internet Service ProvidersTYPO3 | robots | emailphone | none |
| opikconnect.de ↗ | 67* match | OPIK Glasfaser - Ihr Highspeed-Internet Anschluss | Germany de | Internet Service Providers | – | – | none |
| m-net.de ↗ | 61* match | Internet-Anbieter für Glasfaser aus München | M-net | Germany de | Internet Service ProvidersTYPO3 | – | emailphone | none |
| gigabit-internet.de ↗ | 61* match | Gigabit Internet - Verfügbarkeit / Ausbau, Anbieter und Tarife | Germany de | Internet Service ProvidersWordPress | – | phone | none |
| internetanbieter-experte.de ↗ | 61* match | Internetanbieter Vergleich 2026 ab 9,95€/Monat DSL-, Glasfaser-, Kabel- & Mobilfunk-Anbieter vergleichen & sparen | Germany de | Internet Service Providers | – | – | none |
| netcologne.de ↗ | 61* match | Internet, Glasfaser & DSL für dein Zuhause | NetCologne | Germany de | Internet Service Providers | – | none | |
| t-m-net.de ↗ | 61* match | Glasfaser Internet Niedersachsen für Ihr Zuhause - Bungalski | Germany de | Internet Service ProvidersWordPress | robots | emailphone | none |
| glasfaser-internet.de ↗ | 61* match | Glasfaser Internet - Verfügbarkeit / Ausbau, Anbieter und Tarife | Germany de | Internet Service ProvidersWordPress | – | phone | none |
| r-kom.de ↗ | 61* match | Internet, TV und Telefon | Bestes Netz für Ostbayern - R-KOM | Germany de | Internet Service ProvidersLiferay | – | – | none |
| init7.net ↗ | 61* match | Init7 – Schnellstes Glasfaser Internet bis 25 Gbit/s | de | Internet Service Providers | – | – | none |
| chello.at ↗ | 61* match | Ziggo | Internet • TV & Streaming • Bellen | Austria de | Internet Service ProvidersAdobe Experience Manager | – | – | none |
| deutsche-giganetz.de ↗ | 61* match | Deutsche GigaNetz | Glasfaser-Internet - schnell, stabil & zukunftssicher – Deutsche GigaNetz | Germany de | Internet Service ProvidersJoomla | robots | phone | none |
| lf.net ↗ | 61* match | LF.net :: LF.net Netzwerksysteme GmbH :: Internet Service Provider in Stuttgart | de | Internet Service Providers | – | – | none |
| htp.net ↗ | 61* match | Internet, Telefon & Mobil für Hannover, Hildesheim, Hameln, Braunschweig, Peine und Wolfenbüttel | htp.net | de | Internet Service ProvidersTYPO3 | robots | phone | none |
| cosys.cc ↗ | 61* match | Internet von COSYS – Glasfaser, Kabel & IPTV aus der Region - COSYS DATA GmbH | de | Internet Service ProvidersWordPress | robotsllms | none | |
| woerglweb.at ↗ | 61* match | wörglWEB - Internet für zu Hause - Stadtwerke Wörgl | Austria de | Internet Service ProvidersWordPress | robots | emailphone | none |
| mdcc.de ↗ | 61* match | MDCC | Internet, Fernsehen, Telefon für Magdeburg | Germany de | Internet Service Providers | robots | emailphone | none |
| relaix-home.de ↗ | 61* match | Schnelles Internet aus Aachen von RelAix Networks – ab 24,90 € | Germany de | Internet Service Providers | – | emailphone | none |
How the match score works
Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:
- shared topics how many of the same fine‑grained content topics (IAB sub‑categories) both sites cover — the main signal.
- same category whether they sit in the same business / industry category.
- content & title how closely their titles and page descriptions line up in wording and meaning.
No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.