Sites similar to foretees.com
Foretees alternatives & similar sites
ForeTees Club Software — 18 websites ranked by shared content topics, category and on-page relevance.
Each result shows its full tech stack, contacts and AI-policy — not just a name · Browse all sites in Software and Applications →
| Domain | Match | Title | Country/Lang | Category | AI files | Contact | AI-protection |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| jonasclub.com ↗ | 85* match | Jonas Club Software | Technology, Applications & Services for Private Clubs | en | Software and ApplicationsWordPressWooCommerce | – | emailphone | none |
| theclubspot.com ↗ | 85* match | Clubspot - Modern Club Management Software | en | Software and Applications | – | none | |
| withwine.com ↗ | 85* match | WithWine - Winery DTC Software - POS, Ecommerce, Clubs, Apps | en | Software and ApplicationsWordPress | – | – | none |
| buzsoftware.com ↗ | 85* match | Buz Club Software: All-in-One Private Club Management - Buz Club Software | en | Software and Applications | robots | emailphone | none |
| vinesos.com ↗ | 85* match | Winery Software: DTC Wine, POS, Clubs & Ecommerce - VinesOS | en | Software and Applications | robots | none | |
| goriderentals.com ↗ | 85* match | GoRide - End-to-End Boat Rental & Club Management Software | en | Software and Applications | robots | – | none |
| teamkinetic.co.uk ↗ | 85* match | Volunteer management software for managing, recruiting, events, and rotas. TeamKinetic WORKS to build better volunteer communities through volunteering, clubs, events and local activities. Trusted by WCVA, Youth Hostel Association, Manchester City Council, and many others. FREE Community edition for | United Kingdom en | Software and Applications | – | – | none |
| cherryhub.com.au ↗ | 85* match | Club Management Software & Digital Membership Ecosystem | Cherryhub | Australia en | Software and Applications | robots | emailphone | none |
| cal.com ↗ | 70* match | Cal.com | Scheduling Software for Online Bookings | en | Software and Applications | robotsllms | – | none |
| as.me ↗ | 70* match | Acuity Scheduling: Online Booking & Appointment Scheduling Software | en | Software and Applications | robots | – | none |
| tawk.to ↗ | 70* match | tawk.to – "100% FREE live chat software for your website!" | en | Software and ApplicationsWordPress | – | – | none |
| acuityscheduling.com ↗ | 70* match | Acuity Scheduling: Online Booking & Appointment Scheduling Software | en | Software and Applications | robots | – | none |
| setmore.com ↗ | 70* match | Setmore | Free Online Appointment Scheduling Software | en | Software and Applications | – | – | none |
| chaport.com ↗ | 70* match | Chaport: #1 Customer Messaging Software | en | Software and ApplicationsWeebly | – | – | none |
| sharefile.com ↗ | 70* match | Secure Document Workflow & File Sharing Software | ShareFile | en | Software and Applications | – | – | none |
| atlassian.com ↗ | 70* match | Collaboration software for software, IT and business teams | Atlassian | en | Software and Applications | – | – | none |
| providesupport.com ↗ | 70* match | Live Chat for Websites | Customer Support Software | United States~ en | Software and ApplicationsWooCommerce | – | phone | none |
| phorest.com ↗ | 70* match | Premium Salon & Aesthetic Clinic Software | Phorest | en | Software and ApplicationsWordPress | robots | emailphone | none |
How the match score works
Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:
- shared topics how many of the same fine‑grained content topics (IAB sub‑categories) both sites cover — the main signal.
- same category whether they sit in the same business / industry category.
- content & title how closely their titles and page descriptions line up in wording and meaning.
No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.