Sites similar to drhattan.com
Drhattan alternatives & similar sites
Dr. Hattan Aljaaly Expert Plastic & Aesthetic Surgeon in Jeddah — 18 websites ranked by shared content topics, category and on-page relevance.
Each result shows its full tech stack, contacts and AI-policy — not just a name · Browse all sites in Cosmetic Medical Services →
| Domain | Match | Title | Country/Lang | Category | AI files | Contact | AI-protection |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| baaps.org.uk ↗ | 70* match | The British Association of Aesthetic Plastic Surgeons | United Kingdom en | Cosmetic Medical Services | robots | – | none |
| plasticsurgery.org ↗ | 65* match | American Society of Plastic Surgeons | en | Cosmetic Medical Services | – | – | none |
| theaestheticsociety.org ↗ | 65* match | The Aesthetic Society | Advancing Aesthetic Plastic Surgery | en | Cosmetic Medical ServicesDrupal | – | none | |
| akruti.co.in ↗ | 65* match | Best Plastic & Cosmetic Surgeon in Hyderabad: Akruti | India en | Cosmetic Medical ServicesWordPress | robots | emailphone | none |
| miamiaesthetic.com ↗ | 65* match | Board Certified Plastic Surgeon in Miami, FL | Dr. Pat Pazmino | United States~ en | Cosmetic Medical ServicesWordPress | robotsllms | phone | none |
| looknatural.com ↗ | 65* match | The Plastic Surgery Center: Leading Plastic Surgeons in NJ, NY, and PA | en | Cosmetic Medical ServicesHubSpot | – | phone | none |
| drsoniplasticsurgery.com ↗ | 65* match | Plastic Surgeons | Best Plastic Surgery Hospital in Panipat, Haryana | India~ en | Cosmetic Medical Services | robots | emailphone | none |
| cskimplastics.com ↗ | 65* match | Top Plastic Surgeon in Fairfield County, CT | Dr. CS Kim | en | Cosmetic Medical ServicesWordPressWooCommerce | robotsllms | emailphone | none |
| smartbeautyguide.com ↗ | 65* match | The Aesthetic Society | Advancing Aesthetic Plastic Surgery | en | Cosmetic Medical ServicesDrupal | – | none | |
| patelplasticsurgery.com ↗ | 65* match | Plastic Surgery Salt Lake City | Plastic Surgeon St George Utah | BCK Patel | en | Cosmetic Medical ServicesWordPress | robots | emailphone | none |
| realplasticsurgeon.eu ↗ | 65* match | Real Plastic Surgeon | European Union en | Cosmetic Medical Services | robots | – | none |
| crisalix.com ↗ | 60* match | Crisalix | VR 4D & 3D plastic & cosmetic surgery simulator software | en | Cosmetic Medical Services | – | emailphone | none |
| eafps.org ↗ | 60* match | European Academy of Facial Plastic Surgery | EAFPS | en | Cosmetic Medical ServicesWordPressWooCommerce | robotsllms | none | |
| abfprs.org ↗ | 60* match | Home Page - American Board of Facial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery | United States~ en | SurgeryWordPress | robots | none | |
| hdesthetique.com ↗ | 60* match | Miami Cosmetic Surgeon | Breast, Face & Body Surgery HD Esthetique | en | Cosmetic Medical ServicesWordPress | robots | emailphone | none |
| drgenter.com ↗ | 60* match | Plastic Surgery in Philadelphia | Dr. Genter Plastic Surgery | www.drgenter.com | en | Cosmetic Medical ServicesWeebly | robots | phone | none |
| prplastic.com ↗ | 60* match | Best Plastic Surgery Chicago IL | Dr Speron Plastic Surgery | en | Cosmetic Medical Services | robots | emailphone | none |
| polytech-health-aesthetics.com ↗ | 60* match | POLYTECH Breast Implants | POLYTECH Health & Aesthetics | en | Cosmetic Medical ServicesTYPO3 | robots | – | none |
How the match score works
Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:
- shared topics how many of the same fine‑grained content topics (IAB sub‑categories) both sites cover — the main signal.
- same category whether they sit in the same business / industry category.
- content & title how closely their titles and page descriptions line up in wording and meaning.
No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.