similar sites

Browse

Reports

AI ReportState of AI on the open web — who blocks ChatGPT & more Security ReportWordPress vulnerabilities & patch hygiene across the web

Tools

Submit Your Site to AIPush your URL to AI search engines Top 1 Million WebsitesFree top 1M websites — CSV download AI Bot ObservatoryEvery AI crawler & who blocks it AI Crawler Database900+ AI user agents + robots.txt gen AI Crawler ComparisonCompare two AI crawlers head-to-head AI Licensing / Pay-Per-CrawlWho can charge AI crawlers — Pay-Per-Crawl AI Robots.txt Policy BuilderGoal-based robots.txt (cite me, don't train)AI Crawler CheckerSee which AI bots your site blocks AI-Access BadgeFree live AI-status badge for your site AI Readiness CheckerScore your site 0–100 for AI Similar Site SearchFind websites like any domain Backlink CheckerWho links to any site — free All tools →

Toplists Browse free →

Sites similar to dam.mn

Dam alternatives & similar sites

Damn Interesting • Obscure true stories from science & history — 18 websites ranked by shared content topics, category and on-page relevance.

Each result shows its full tech stack, contacts and AI-policy — not just a name · Browse all sites in Science →

Domain	Match	Title	Country/Lang	Category	AI files	Contact	AI-protection
damninteresting.com ↗	58 match shared topic	Damn Interesting • Obscure true stories from science & history	en	science WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
mentalfloss.com ↗	38 match shared topic	Mental Floss - History, Trivia, Interesting Facts, and More	en	history	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
storycollider.org ↗	38 match shared topic	The Story Collider \| True Personal Stories About Science – Podcast, Live Shows & Storytelling Workshops	en	science Squarespace Squarespace Commerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
newscientist.com ↗	32 match shared topic	New Scientist \| Science news, articles, and features	en	science WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
livescience.com ↗	32 match shared topic	Live Science \| Latest science news and articles for those with curious minds	United States~ en	science	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
nationalacademies.org ↗	32 match shared topic	National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine	en	science	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
ornl.gov ↗	32 match shared topic	Oak Ridge National Laboratory: Big Science. Big Impact. \| ORNL	en	science Drupal	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
simonsfoundation.org ↗	32 match shared topic	Advancing Research in Basic Science and Mathematics \| Simons Foundation	en	science Weebly	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
sciencenews.org ↗	32 match shared topic	Science News \| The latest news from all areas of science	en	science WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
cost.eu ↗	32 match shared topic	COST \| European Cooperation in Science and Technology	European Union en	science	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
williamengdahl.com ↗	32 match shared topic	Planck Foundation \| \| integrating all branches of science into comprehensive analyses and models \| \| Monetary Sciences \| \| Economic Sciences \| \| Energy Sciences \| \| Physical Sciences \| \| Agricultural Sciences \| \| Planck Foundation is founded and funded by Gijs Graafland in 1999.	en	science WordPress Lightspeed	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
desertcorp.com ↗	32 match shared topic	Planck Foundation \| \| integrating all branches of science into comprehensive analyses and models \| \| Monetary Sciences \| \| Economic Sciences \| \| Energy Sciences \| \| Physical Sciences \| \| Agricultural Sciences \| \| Planck Foundation is founded and funded by Gijs Graafland in 1999.	en	science WordPress Lightspeed	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
globalfood.info ↗	32 match shared topic	Planck Foundation \| \| integrating all branches of science into comprehensive analyses and models \| \| Monetary Sciences \| \| Economic Sciences \| \| Energy Sciences \| \| Physical Sciences \| \| Agricultural Sciences \| \| Planck Foundation is founded and funded by Gijs Graafland in 1999.	en	science WordPress Lightspeed	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
worldclusters.com ↗	32 match shared topic	Planck Foundation \| \| integrating all branches of science into comprehensive analyses and models \| \| Monetary Sciences \| \| Economic Sciences \| \| Energy Sciences \| \| Physical Sciences \| \| Agricultural Sciences \| \| Planck Foundation is founded and funded by Gijs Graafland in 1999.	en	science WordPress Lightspeed	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
intracontinental.org ↗	32 match shared topic	Planck Foundation \| \| integrating all branches of science into comprehensive analyses and models \| \| Monetary Sciences \| \| Economic Sciences \| \| Energy Sciences \| \| Physical Sciences \| \| Agricultural Sciences \| \| Planck Foundation is founded and funded by Gijs Graafland in 1999.	en	science WordPress Lightspeed	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
planck.org ↗	32 match shared topic	Planck Foundation \| \| integrating all branches of science into comprehensive analyses and models \| \| Monetary Sciences \| \| Economic Sciences \| \| Energy Sciences \| \| Physical Sciences \| \| Agricultural Sciences \| \| Planck Foundation is founded and funded by Gijs Graafland in 1999.	en	science WordPress Lightspeed	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
worldhistory.org ↗	32 match shared topic	World History Encyclopedia	United Kingdom~ en	history	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
nautil.us ↗	32 match shared topic	Nautilus \| Science Connected	United States en	science WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

shared topics how many of the same fine‑grained content topics (IAB sub‑categories) both sites cover — the main signal.
same category whether they sit in the same business / industry category.
content & title how closely their titles and page descriptions line up in wording and meaning.

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.