Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfilePricingAI ReportToplistsBrowse free →

Sites similar to crh.com

Crh alternatives & similar sites

Leading Provider of Building Materials - CRH — 18 websites ranked by shared content topics, category and on-page relevance.

Each result shows its full tech stack, contacts and AI-policy — not just a name · Browse all sites in Construction Industry →

DomainMatchTitleCountry/LangCategoryAI filesContactAI-protection
srsdistribution.com 70 match
shared topic
Roofing Materials & Building Supplies | SRS Distribution en construction-industry robotsllmsaihumans emailphone none
bc.com 70 match
shared topic
Boise Cascade Wood Products Building Materials - Boise Cascade en construction-industryWordPressWooCommerce robotsllmsaihumans emailphone none
lysaght.com 70 match
shared topic
LYSAGHT® | Leading Steel Building Products in Australia en construction-industryDrupal robotsllmsaihumans emailphone none
barbourproductsearch.info 70 match
shared topic
Building Materials Directory | Barbour Product Search en construction-industry robotsllmsaihumans emailphone none
daytonsuperior.com 70 match
shared topic
Concrete Products Provider | Explore Concrete Building Systems & Concrete Construction Products at Dayton Superior en construction-industry robotsllmsaihumans emailphone none
commercialbuildingauthority.com 62 match
shared topic
Commercial Building Network: Purpose and Scope | Commercial Building en construction-industry robotsllmsaihumans emailphone full · 16
commercialcontractorsdirectory.com 62 match
shared topic
Commercial Contractors Provider Network | Commercial Contractors Directory en construction-industry robotsllmsaihumans emailphone full · 16
napit.org.uk 62 match
shared topic
Promoting Excellence In The Building Services & Fabric Sector | NAPIT United Kingdom en construction-industry robotsllmsaihumans emailphone none
emcorgroup.com 62 match
shared topic
EMCOR Group, Inc. | Mechanical & Electrical Construction, Energy & Facilities Services, Sustainability & Green Building Solutions en construction-industryConcrete5 robotsllmsaihumans emailphone none
heidelbergmaterials.us 62 match
shared topic
Heidelberg Materials North America|Construction Materials United States en construction-industry robotsllmsaihumans emailphone none
wienerberger.com 62 match
shared topic
wienerberger - The future of building en construction-industryAdobe Experience Manager robotsllmsaihumans emailphone none
eltete.com 62 match
shared topic
Eltete - Leading Sustainable Packaging and Construction Solutions en construction-industryWordPress robotsllmsaihumans emailphone none
actbuildingsystems.com 62 match
shared topic
Cold Formed Building Systems - ACT Building Systems en construction-industryWordPress robotsllmsaihumans emailphone none
naturalstoneinstitute.org 62 match
shared topic
Natural Stone Institute - Stone Industry Resources From The Leading Association Natural Stone Institute en construction-industry robotsllmsaihumans emailphone none
heidelbergmaterials.com 62 match
shared topic
Making a material difference | Heidelberg Materials Germany~ en construction-industryDrupal robotsllmsaihumans emailphone none
socotec.co.uk 62 match
shared topic
Building Trust for a Safer and Sustainable World | SOCOTEC UK United Kingdom en construction-industryDrupal robotsllmsaihumans emailphone none
elastochem.com 62 match
shared topic
Elastochem – Spray foam insulation and coating systems for building efficiency and performance en construction-industryWordPress robotsllmsaihumans emailphone none
buildingconnected.com 62 match
shared topic
BuildingConnected | Preconstruction Software en construction-industryWordPress robotsllmsaihumans emailphone none

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.