Sites similar to communityin.org
Communityin alternatives & similar sites
Community Initiatives | Fiscal Sponsorship and Nonprofit Support — 18 websites ranked by shared content topics, category and on-page relevance.
Each result shows its full tech stack, contacts and AI-policy — not just a name · Browse all sites in Non Profit Organizations →
| Domain | Match | Title | Country/Lang | Category | AI files | Contact | AI-protection |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| communityinitiatives.org ↗ | 85* match | Community Initiatives | Fiscal Sponsorship and Nonprofit Support | en | Non Profit OrganizationsWordPress | robots | phone | none |
| lisc.org ↗ | 65* match | Home | Local Initiatives Support Corporation | en | Non Profit Organizations | – | – | none |
| numfocus.org ↗ | 65* match | NumFOCUS: A Nonprofit Supporting Open Code for Better Science | en | Non Profit OrganizationsWordPressWooCommerce | robots | – | none |
| givingmatters.com ↗ | 65* match | Find & Support Middle Tennessee Nonprofits | GivingMatters | United States~ en | Non Profit OrganizationsWordPress | – | emailphone | none |
| sponsorship.org ↗ | 65* match | European Sponsorship Association – the essential and inclusive community for all professionals working in sponsorship | en | Non Profit OrganizationsWordPressWooCommerce | robots | – | none |
| helpster.charity ↗ | 65* match | Helpster Charity – EU Nonprofit Supporting Children in Need | en | Non Profit Organizations | robots | none | |
| candid.org ↗ | 60* match | Research nonprofits, funders, and grants | Candid | en | Non Profit OrganizationsWordPress | robotsllms | none | |
| qgiv.com ↗ | 60* match | A Unified Fundraising Platform for Nonprofits | Bloomerang Fundraising | en | Non Profit Organizations | – | – | none |
| givelively.org ↗ | 60* match | Give Lively - A Free Fundraising Platform For Nonprofits | en | Non Profit Organizations | – | – | none |
| greatnonprofits.org ↗ | 60* match | GreatNonprofits - Find Top-Rated Nonprofits and Charities | United States~ en | Non Profit Organizations | robotsllms | full · 11 | |
| membershiptoolkit.com ↗ | 60* match | Software for Nonprofits - Membership Toolkit | en | Non Profit OrganizationsWordPressWooCommerce | robots | – | none |
| givesmart.com ↗ | 60* match | Fundraising Software for Nonprofits | GiveSmart | en | Non Profit OrganizationsWordPress | – | emailphone | none |
| amtamassage.org ↗ | 60* match | American Massage Therapy Association (AMTA) | The Leading Nonprofit for Massage Therapists | United States~ en | Non Profit Organizations | – | emailphone | none |
| givelify.com ↗ | 60* match | Best app to give and collect online donations for your church or nonprofit | en | Non Profit OrganizationsWordPress | – | – | none |
| thecvf.com ↗ | 60* match | The Computer Vision Foundation – A non-profit organization that fosters and supports research in all aspects of computer vision | en | Non Profit OrganizationsWordPress | – | – | none |
| giv.li ↗ | 60* match | Best app to give and collect online donations for your church or nonprofit | Liechtenstein en | Non Profit OrganizationsWordPress | robots | – | none |
| donorperfect.com ↗ | 60* match | Fundraising Software for NonProfit Donor Management | en | Non Profit OrganizationsWordPress | – | phone | none |
| flipcause.com ↗ | 60* match | DONATION Pro - Essential Technology for Small Nonprofits | en | Non Profit OrganizationsWordPress | – | – | none |
How the match score works
Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:
- shared topics how many of the same fine‑grained content topics (IAB sub‑categories) both sites cover — the main signal.
- same category whether they sit in the same business / industry category.
- content & title how closely their titles and page descriptions line up in wording and meaning.
No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.