Sites similar to communitiesfirst.us
Communitiesfirst alternatives & similar sites
Communities First | Centering Frontline Communities & Transforming Public Investment — 18 websites ranked by shared content topics, category and on-page relevance.
Each result shows its full tech stack, contacts and AI-policy — not just a name · Browse all sites in Non Profit Organizations →
| Domain | Match | Title | Country/Lang | Category | AI files | Contact | AI-protection |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| otf.ca ↗ | 60* match | Ontario Trillium Foundation | Building Healthy and Vibrant Communities Across Ontario | Canada en | Non Profit OrganizationsDrupal | robots | – | none |
| e-voice.org.uk ↗ | 60* match | Voice Online Communities | Free Website Builder | United Kingdom en | Non Profit Organizations | robots | – | none |
| mutualofomahafoundation.org ↗ | 60* match | Mutual of Omaha Foundation | Explore Our Impact & Investments | en | Non Profit Organizations | – | – | none |
| digitalpublicgoods.net ↗ | 60* match | Digital Public Goods Alliance | en | Non Profit Organizations | – | – | none |
| cupe.ca ↗ | 60* match | Canadian Union of Public Employees | Canadian Union of Public Employees | Canada en | Non Profit OrganizationsDrupal | – | – | none |
| stonewall.org.uk ↗ | 60* match | The leading charity supporting LGBTQ+ communities in… | Stonewall UK | United Kingdom en | Non Profit OrganizationsShopify | – | none | |
| cftexas.org ↗ | 60* match | Where Giving Thrives - Communities Foundation Of Texas | en | Non Profit OrganizationsWordPress | – | phone | none |
| ondiversity.com ↗ | 60* match | Diversity in Organizations, Communities & Nations Research Network | United States~ en | Non Profit Organizations | – | none | |
| impactlebanon.org ↗ | 60* match | Impact Lebanon – Empowering Communities to Build a Prosperous Lebanon | en | Non Profit Organizations | robots | – | none |
| azfoundation.org ↗ | 60* match | Supporting Arizona communities through charitable giving | en | Non Profit OrganizationsWordPress | robots | – | none |
| bprovidence.org ↗ | 60* match | BProvidence Int'l. (a Public Benefit Multi-Divisions Co.) - The Sts. Anne & Joachim Catholic Network | en | Non Profit Organizations | – | none | |
| unitedway.ca ↗ | 60* match | United Way Centraide Canada - Supporting Communities Across Canada | Canada en | Non Profit OrganizationsWordPress | – | – | none |
| sdfoundation.org ↗ | 60* match | San Diego Foundation | Just, Equitable and Resilient Communities | en | Non Profit OrganizationsWordPress | robots | emailphone | none |
| altagooddeeds.org ↗ | 60* match | ALTA Good Deeds Foundation – Good deeds grow communities. | en | Non Profit OrganizationsWordPress | robots | – | none |
| communitypartners.org ↗ | 60* match | Community Partners - Creating more equitable, just, and vibrant communities | en | Non Profit OrganizationsWordPress | robots | – | none |
| thenonprofittimes.com ↗ | 60* match | The Leading Business Publication for Nonprofit Management - The NonProfit Times | en | Non Profit OrganizationsWordPress | robots | – | none |
| surdna.org ↗ | 60* match | Supporting Just and Sustainable Communities - Surdna Foundation | en | Non Profit OrganizationsWordPress | robots | phone | none |
| houstonpeersuccess.org ↗ | 60* match | Houston Peer Success – Transforming lives, through collaborations | en | Non Profit OrganizationsWordPress | robots | none |
How the match score works
Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:
- shared topics how many of the same fine‑grained content topics (IAB sub‑categories) both sites cover — the main signal.
- same category whether they sit in the same business / industry category.
- content & title how closely their titles and page descriptions line up in wording and meaning.
No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.