similar sites

Browse

Pricing AI Report

Tools

Submit Your Site to AIPush your URL to AI search engines Top 1 Million WebsitesFree top 1M websites — CSV download AI Bot ObservatoryEvery AI crawler & who blocks it AI Crawler Database900+ AI user agents + robots.txt gen AI Crawler ComparisonCompare two AI crawlers head-to-head AI Licensing / Pay-Per-CrawlWho can charge AI crawlers — Pay-Per-Crawl AI Robots.txt Policy BuilderGoal-based robots.txt (cite me, don't train)AI Crawler CheckerSee which AI bots your site blocks AI Readiness CheckerScore your site 0–100 for AI Similar Site SearchFind websites like any domain Backlink CheckerWho links to any site — free All tools →

Toplists Browse free →

Sites similar to cio-sharing.org

Cio Sharing alternatives & similar sites

CIO シェアリング協議会 — 18 websites ranked by shared content topics, category and on-page relevance.

Each result shows its full tech stack, contacts and AI-policy — not just a name · Browse all sites in Human Resources →

Domain	Match	Title	Country/Lang	Category	AI files	Contact	AI-protection
precious.jp ↗	30 match shared topic	Precious.jp（プレシャス） \| ラグジュアリー体験の入り口メディア	Japan ja	style-and-fashion	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
job-gear.net ↗	28 match shared topic	Jobギア採促（ジョブギア採促）\|採用ホームページ構築！indeedへも自動掲載されるアイデムの「Jobギア採促」で人材採用サイト制作	ja	human-resources WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
hrmos.co ↗	28 match shared topic	HRMOS（ハーモス）シリーズ\| 人事･バックオフィスを進化させる	Colombia ja	human-resources	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
atlas.jp ↗	28 match shared topic	株式会社アトラス : 研究者が研究に専念できる世界へ - 株式会社アトラス	Japan ja	technology-industry	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
hitachi.co.jp ↗	28 match shared topic	日本 Home：日立	Japan ja	technology-industry Adobe Experience Manager	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
atcompany.jp ↗	28 match shared topic	アットカンパニー｜求人のプロがついた採用管理システム（ATS）	Japan ja	human-resources WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
kyocera.co.jp ↗	28 match shared topic	京セラ株式会社	Japan ja	technology-industry	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
herlk.com ↗	28 match shared topic	辉达- 辉达平台 \| 创建注册账号_帐号ID注册	ja	technology-industry WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
job-gear.jp ↗	28 match shared topic	Jobギア採促（ジョブギア採促）\|採用ホームページ構築！indeedへも自動掲載されるアイデムの「Jobギア採促」で人材採用サイト制作	Japan ja	human-resources WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
dena.com ↗	28 match shared topic	株式会社ディー・エヌ・エー \| DeNA	ja	technology-industry	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
pasonagroup.co.jp ↗	28 match shared topic	パソナグループ	Japan ja	human-resources	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
shimadzu.co.jp ↗	28 match shared topic	[SHIMADZU] 島津製作所	Japan ja	technology-industry Drupal	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
horei.co.jp ↗	28 match shared topic	日本法令	Japan ja	human-resources	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
jinjibu.jp ↗	28 match shared topic	『日本の人事部』 - HRで会社を伸ばす	Japan ja	human-resources	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	partial · 6
agekke.co.jp ↗	28 match shared topic	株式会社エイジェック \| 人材の総合プロデュース企業	Japan ja	human-resources WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
keyence.co.jp ↗	28 match shared topic	キーエンス	Japan ja	technology-industry	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
screen.co.jp ↗	28 match shared topic	株式会社SCREENホールディングス	Japan ja	technology-industry Concrete5	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
persol-group.co.jp ↗	28 match shared topic	PERSOL（パーソル）グループ - はたらいて、笑おう。	Japan ja	human-resources WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

shared topics how many of the same fine‑grained content topics (IAB sub‑categories) both sites cover — the main signal.
same category whether they sit in the same business / industry category.
content & title how closely their titles and page descriptions line up in wording and meaning.

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.