Sites similar to changeapath.org
Changeapath alternatives & similar sites
Change A Path | We make grants that fight sex trafficking. — 18 websites ranked by shared content topics, category and on-page relevance.
Each result shows its full tech stack, contacts and AI-policy — not just a name · Browse all sites in Non Profit Organizations →
| Domain | Match | Title | Country/Lang | Category | AI files | Contact | AI-protection |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| thepollinationproject.org ↗ | 65* match | Micro Grants for Social Change | The Pollination Project | en | Non Profit OrganizationsWordPressWooCommerce | robots | – | none |
| changemakers.com ↗ | 65* match | Homepage | Changemakers | en | Non Profit OrganizationsDrupal | – | – | none |
| changemakerxchange.org ↗ | 65* match | ChangemakerXchange - Global community of young social innovators | en | Non Profit OrganizationsWordPress | robots | – | none |
| talradio.org ↗ | 65* match | TALRadio – Digital Multilingual Kindness Radio for Nonprofits & Changemakers | en | Non Profit Organizations | robotsllms | – | none |
| taltalks.org ↗ | 65* match | Where Changemakers Share Stories of Social Impact - TALTalks | en | Non Profit OrganizationsWordPress | robots | none | |
| candid.org ↗ | 60* match | Research nonprofits, funders, and grants | Candid | en | Non Profit OrganizationsWordPress | robotsllms | none | |
| ssir.org ↗ | 60* match | Stanford Social Innovation Review: Informing and Inspiring Leaders of Social Change | en | Non Profit Organizations | robots | – | none |
| care.org ↗ | 60* match | CARE - Fighting Global Poverty and World Hunger | en | Non Profit OrganizationsWordPress | – | – | none |
| makesomenoise.com ↗ | 60* match | Global's Make Some Noise | Global's Make Some Noise | en | Non Profit OrganizationsSanity | – | – | none |
| moveforhunger.org ↗ | 60* match | Move For Hunger | Fighting Food Insecurity & Food Waste | United States~ en | Non Profit OrganizationsConcrete5 | robots | emailphone | none |
| oxfam.org.uk ↗ | 60* match | Oxfam GB | leading UK charity fighting global poverty | United Kingdom en | Non Profit Organizations | – | – | none |
| firehero.org ↗ | 60* match | National Fallen Firefighters Foundation | en | Non Profit OrganizationsWordPress | – | – | none |
| seiu.org ↗ | 60* match | SEIU Homepage - Service Employees International Union (SEIU) – Fighting for Unions for All so every worker can bargain for a better life. | en | Non Profit OrganizationsWordPress | robots | – | none |
| christianaid.org.uk ↗ | 60* match | Christian Aid - UK charity fighting global poverty - Christian Aid | United Kingdom en | Non Profit OrganizationsDrupal | – | – | none |
| sedexcertifications.com ↗ | 60* match | SEDEX – Supplier Ethical Data Exchange, Sedex Certifications | en | Non Profit Organizations | robots | – | none |
| oxfamamerica.org ↗ | 60* match | Oxfam - Fighting Inequality to End Poverty & Injustice | Oxfam | United States~ en | Non Profit Organizations | – | emailphone | none |
| oakfnd.org ↗ | 60* match | Oak Foundation - Through our grant-making, we support others to make the world a safer, fairer, and more sustainable place to live. | en | Non Profit OrganizationsWordPress | – | – | none |
| escrip.com ↗ | 60* match | eScrip - make a difference for your school or nonprofit. | United States~ en | Non Profit Organizations | robots | – | none |
How the match score works
Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:
- shared topics how many of the same fine‑grained content topics (IAB sub‑categories) both sites cover — the main signal.
- same category whether they sit in the same business / industry category.
- content & title how closely their titles and page descriptions line up in wording and meaning.
No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.