Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfilePricingAI ReportToplistsBrowse free →

Sites similar to bsg.tech

Bsg alternatives & similar sites

Penetration Testing & Application Security | BSG — 18 websites ranked by shared content topics, category and on-page relevance.

Each result shows its full tech stack, contacts and AI-policy — not just a name · Browse all sites in Information And Network Security →

DomainMatchTitleCountry/LangCategoryAI filesContactAI-protection
beaglesecurity.com 85 match
shared topic
Beagle Security: AI-powered AppSec platform | Web application & API penetration testing en information-and-network-security robotsllmsaihumans emailphone none
plutosec.us 78 match
shared topic
Cybersecurity & Penetration Testing Services USA | Pluto Security United States en information-and-network-security robotsllmsaihumans emailphone none
networking4all.com 78 match
shared topic
Expert in SSL, Penetration testing & Managed Security | Networking4all Netherlands~ en information-and-network-securityStoryblok robotsllmsaihumans emailphone none
7asecurity.com 78 match
shared topic
7ASecurity: Penetration Testing for Serious Teams | 7ASecurity en information-and-network-security robotsllmsaihumans emailphone none
owasp.org 70 match
shared topic
OWASP Foundation, the Open Source Foundation for Application Security | OWASP Foundation en information-and-network-security robotsllmsaihumans emailphone none
kali.org 70 match
shared topic
Kali Linux | Penetration Testing and Ethical Hacking Linux Distribution en information-and-network-security robotsllmsaihumans emailphone none
acsac.org 70 match
shared topic
IEEE Annual Computer Security Applications Conference (ACSAC) en information-and-network-security robotsllmsaihumans emailphone none
sec-consult.com 70 match
shared topic
SEC Consult - a leading consultant in application and cybersecurity as well as IT security en information-and-network-securityTYPO3 robotsllmsaihumans emailphone none
wpguardian.io 62 match
shared topic
Effective Security for WordPress Sites- WPGuardian en information-and-network-securityWordPress robotsllmsaihumans emailphone none
domaintools.com 62 match
shared topic
Threat Intelligence & Domain Security Platform | DomainTools en information-and-network-security robotsllmsaihumans emailphone none
eset.com 62 match
shared topic
ESET Cybersecurity | Enterprise, Business and Home Solutions | ESET en information-and-network-securityTYPO3 robotsllmsaihumans emailphone none
sitelock.com 62 match
shared topic
Website Security Monitoring & Malware Protection | SiteLock en information-and-network-security robotsllmsaihumans emailphone none
fortinet.com 62 match
shared topic
Global Leader of Cybersecurity Solutions and Services | Fortinet en information-and-network-securityAdobe Experience Manager robotsllmsaihumans emailphone none
securitymetrics.com 62 match
shared topic
PCI | HIPAA | Credit Card Compliance | SecurityMetrics en information-and-network-security robotsllmsaihumans emailphone none
cscdbs.com 62 match
shared topic
CSC | The Most Security Conscious Domains Provider | CSC en information-and-network-security robotsllmsaihumans emailphone none
coram.ai 62 match
shared topic
Coram: Unified Physical Security Platform en information-and-network-security robotsllmsaihumans emailphone none
webnamescorporate.com 62 match
shared topic
Webnames Corporate | Domain Management, Brand Security, DNS & SSL en information-and-network-securityWordPress robotsllmsaihumans emailphone none
acronis.com 62 match
shared topic
AI-Powered Cybersecurity, Data Protection & IT Automation | Acronis en information-and-network-security robotsllmsaihumans emailphone partial · 8

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.