similar sites

Browse

Pricing AI Report

Tools

Submit Your Site to AIPush your URL to AI search engines Top 1 Million WebsitesFree top 1M websites — CSV download AI Bot ObservatoryEvery AI crawler & who blocks it AI Crawler Database900+ AI user agents + robots.txt gen AI Crawler ComparisonCompare two AI crawlers head-to-head AI Licensing / Pay-Per-CrawlWho can charge AI crawlers — Pay-Per-Crawl AI Robots.txt Policy BuilderGoal-based robots.txt (cite me, don't train)AI Crawler CheckerSee which AI bots your site blocks AI Readiness CheckerScore your site 0–100 for AI Similar Site SearchFind websites like any domain Backlink CheckerWho links to any site — free All tools →

Toplists Browse free →

Sites similar to baam.se

Baam alternatives & similar sites

WWWe å fasa — 18 websites ranked by shared content topics, category and on-page relevance.

Each result shows its full tech stack, contacts and AI-policy — not just a name · Browse all sites in Politics →

Domain	Match	Title	Country/Lang	Category	AI files	Contact	AI-protection
dagenssamhalle.se ↗	55 match shared topic	Dagens Samhälle - Aktuella nyheter	Sweden sv	politics	robotsllmsaihumans	email phone	none
flamman.se ↗	55 match shared topic	Flamman \| Grundad i Malmfälten 1906	Sweden sv	politics WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
dalademokraten.se ↗	55 match shared topic	Dala-Demokraten – Opinion och nyhetsfördjupning	Sweden sv	politics	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	full · 17
aftonbladet.se ↗	37 match shared topic	Aftonbladet	Sweden sv	politics	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
regeringen.se ↗	37 match shared topic	Startsidan - Regeringen.se	Sweden sv	political-issues-and-policy	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
mitti.se ↗	37 match shared topic	Mitt i - Nyheter Stockholm	Sweden sv	politics	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
liberalerna.se ↗	37 match shared topic	Liberalerna – Sveriges liberala parti	Sweden sv	politics WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
altinget.se ↗	37 match shared topic	Altinget \| Nyheter, analyser och debatt om svensk politik	Sweden sv	politics	robotsllmsaihumans	email phone	none
muf.se ↗	37 match shared topic	Moderata Ungdomsförbundet (MUF)	Sweden sv	political-issues-and-policy WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
vlt.se ↗	37 match shared topic	VLT – Nära dig – dygnet runt	Sweden sv	politics	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
piratpartiet.se ↗	37 match shared topic	Piratpartiet – Den digitala tidsålderns politiska kraft	Sweden sv	political-issues-and-policy WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
dagensarena.se ↗	37 match shared topic	Dagens Arena \| Oberoende och progressiv	Sweden sv	politics WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
ui.se ↗	37 match shared topic	UI.se \| Utrikespolitiska institutet	Sweden sv	politics	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
sydsvenskan.se ↗	28 match shared topic	Sydsvenskan – Nyheter Dygnet Runt	Sweden sv	politics	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
socialdemokraterna.se ↗	28 match shared topic	Socialdemokraterna \| Ny riktning för Sverige	Sweden sv	politics	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
hd.se ↗	28 match shared topic	HD – Nyheter Dygnet Runt	Sweden sv	elections	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
moderaterna.se ↗	28 match shared topic	För ett rättvisare Sverige\| Moderaterna	Sweden sv	politics WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
folkbladet.nu ↗	28 match shared topic	Nyheter från hela Västerbotten \| Folkbladet	sv	civic-affairs	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

shared topics how many of the same fine‑grained content topics (IAB sub‑categories) both sites cover — the main signal.
same category whether they sit in the same business / industry category.
content & title how closely their titles and page descriptions line up in wording and meaning.

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.