Sites similar to authenticweb.app
Authenticweb alternatives & similar sites
Authentic Web – Enterprise Domain management for the new TLD Era — 18 websites ranked by shared content topics, category and on-page relevance.
Each result shows its full tech stack, contacts and AI-policy — not just a name · Browse all sites in Information and Network Security →
| Domain | Match | Title | Country/Lang | Category | AI files | Contact | AI-protection |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| authenticweb.com ↗ | 85* match | Authentic Web – Enterprise Domain management for the new TLD Era | en | Information and Network SecurityWordPress | robotsllms | – | none |
| webnamescorporate.com ↗ | 70* match | Webnames Corporate | Domain Management, Brand Security, DNS & SSL | en | Information and Network SecurityWordPress | robotsllms | emailphone | none |
| hexnode.com ↗ | 65* match | Hexnode | Enterprise Device Management & Security | en | Information and Network Security | – | phone | none |
| signinsolutions.com ↗ | 65* match | Sign In Solutions - Enterprise Visitor Management Solutions | en | Information and Network SecurityHubSpot | robots | – | none |
| tokenring.com ↗ | 65* match | Token: Biometric Authentication for Enterprise Security | en | Information and Network SecurityHubSpot | robots | – | none |
| tokencore.com ↗ | 65* match | Token: Biometric Authentication for Enterprise Security | en | Information and Network SecurityHubSpot | – | – | none |
| domaintools.com ↗ | 60* match | Threat Intelligence & Domain Security Platform | DomainTools | en | Information and Network Security | – | none | |
| urldefense.com ↗ | 60* match | Proofpoint - ZenWeb™ | en | Information and Network Security | robots | – | none |
| trustarc.com ↗ | 60* match | Data Privacy Management Software & Solutions | TrustArc | United States~ en | Information and Network SecurityWordPress | robots | phone | none |
| comodo.com ↗ | 60* match | Advanced Website Protection for Unmatched Cyber Defense | en | Information and Network SecurityWordPressWooCommerce | – | emailphone | none |
| eset.com ↗ | 60* match | ESET Cybersecurity | Enterprise, Business and Home Solutions | ESET | en | Information and Network SecurityTYPO3 | – | – | none |
| sitelock.com ↗ | 60* match | Website Security Monitoring & Malware Protection | SiteLock | en | Information and Network Security | – | phone | none |
| truste.com ↗ | 60* match | Data Privacy Management Software & Solutions | TrustArc | United States~ en | Information and Network SecurityWordPress | robots | phone | none |
| cscdbs.com ↗ | 60* match | CSC | The Most Security Conscious Domains Provider | CSC | en | Information and Network Security | – | – | none |
| globalblock.co ↗ | 60* match | Unified Domain Blocking Service Protecting Brands Online | GlobalBlock | Colombia en | Information and Network SecurityWordPress | robotsllms | – | none |
| bunkerweb.io ↗ | 60* match | BunkerWeb - The open-source Web Application Firewall (WAF) | en | Information and Network SecurityWordPress | – | none | |
| paloaltonetworks.com ↗ | 60* match | Leader in Cybersecurity Protection & Software for the Modern Enterprises - Palo Alto Networks | en | Information and Network SecurityAdobe Experience Manager | robotsllms | – | none |
| 1password.com ↗ | 60* match | Passwords, Secrets, and Access Management | 1Password | en | Information and Network Security | robots | – | none |
How the match score works
Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:
- shared topics how many of the same fine‑grained content topics (IAB sub‑categories) both sites cover — the main signal.
- same category whether they sit in the same business / industry category.
- content & title how closely their titles and page descriptions line up in wording and meaning.
No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.