Sites similar to aisle.com
Aisle alternatives & similar sites
AISLE | AI-Native Vulnerability Management — 18 websites ranked by shared content topics, category and on-page relevance.
Each result shows its full tech stack, contacts and AI-policy — not just a name · Browse all sites in Artificial Intelligence →
| Domain | Match | Title | Country/Lang | Category | AI files | Contact | AI-protection |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| tenable.com ↗ | 75* match | Vulnerability and exposure management | Cloud and AI security | Tenable® | en | Information and Network SecurityDrupal | – | – | none |
| livingsecurity.com ↗ | 75* match | Living Security | AI-Native Human Risk Management | United States~ en | Artificial IntelligenceHubSpot | – | none | |
| zafran.io ↗ | 75* match | Zafran | AI-Native Threat Exposure Management Platform | en | Information and Network SecurityWebflow | robots | none | |
| scanninja.app ↗ | 75* match | Free Trial — AI-Driven Vulnerability Management | Scan Ninja | en | Artificial Intelligence | robotsllms | phone | none |
| hackerone.com ↗ | 65* match | HackerOne | Leader in Continuous Threat Exposure Management | Security for AI | en | Information and Network SecurityDrupal | robots | – | none |
| securitypal.com ↗ | 65* match | Cybersecurity Assurance Management Platform: AI + Certified Experts | SecurityPal AI | United States~ en | Information and Network SecurityHubSpot CMS | – | – | none |
| accessdata.com ↗ | 65* match | Exterro | AI-Powered Data Risk Management Platform | en | Artificial Intelligence | – | – | none |
| upguard.com ↗ | 65* match | The #1 Cyber Risk Posture Management Platform | UpGuard | Australia~ en | Information and Network Security | – | none | |
| cantina.xyz ↗ | 65* match | Cantina | AI-Native Security, Backed by Human Expertise | en | Information and Network Security | robotsllms | – | none |
| tenex.ai ↗ | 65* match | AI-Native SOC & Managed Detection Response | TENEX.AI | en | Artificial IntelligenceWordPress | robotsllms | phone | none |
| aembit.io ↗ | 65* match | Aembit | Agentic AI and Workload Identity & Access Management | en | Information and Network SecurityWordPressLightspeed | robotsllms | – | none |
| exabeam.com ↗ | 65* match | Exabeam | Cybersecurity & Compliance with Security Log Management and SIEM | en | Information and Network SecurityWordPress | robotsllms | emailphone | partial · 1 |
| logrhythm.com ↗ | 65* match | Exabeam | Cybersecurity & Compliance with Security Log Management and SIEM | en | Information and Network SecurityWordPress | robots | emailphone | none |
| ai-alert.org ↗ | 65* match | AI Alert — AI Incident & ML Vulnerability Tracking | en | Information and Network Security | robotsllms | – | none |
| runzero.com ↗ | 65* match | runZero: Exposure Management for the AI-attack era | en | Information and Network Security | robots | – | none |
| exterro.com ↗ | 65* match | Exterro | AI-Powered Data Risk Management Platform | en | Artificial Intelligence | – | – | none |
| saviynt.com ↗ | 65* match | Saviynt | AI-Based Identity Security and Access Management Platform Solutions | en | Information and Network SecurityHubSpot | robots | – | none |
| lakera.ai ↗ | 65* match | Lakera: The AI-Native Security Platform to Accelerate GenAI | en | Information and Network Security | – | – | none |
How the match score works
Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:
- shared topics how many of the same fine‑grained content topics (IAB sub‑categories) both sites cover — the main signal.
- same category whether they sit in the same business / industry category.
- content & title how closely their titles and page descriptions line up in wording and meaning.
No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.