Sites similar to achin.ca
Achin alternatives & similar sites
Andrew Chin | Ph.D. Student School of Cybersecurity and Privacy Georgia Institute of Technology CODA S0971Y, Atlanta GA achin34@gatech.edu [Github] [LinkedIn] — 18 websites ranked by shared content topics, category and on-page relevance.
Each result shows its full tech stack, contacts and AI-policy — not just a name · Browse all sites in Information and Network Security →
| Domain | Match | Title | Country/Lang | Category | AI files | Contact | AI-protection |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| sans.edu ↗ | 70* match | Cybersecurity Degree and Certificate Programs | SANS Technology Institute | en | Information and Network Security | – | – | none |
| a-lign.com ↗ | 65* match | A-LIGN | Compliance, Cybersecurity, Cyber Risk & Privacy | en | Information and Network SecurityWordPress | – | – | none |
| prebytes.com ↗ | 65* match | PREBYTES | Proprietary Cybersecurity & Anti-Fraud Technology | Poland~ en | Information and Network Security | – | emailphone | none |
| nozominetworks.com ↗ | 65* match | The Leader in OT Cybersecurity Technology | Nozomi Networks | en | Information and Network Security | – | – | none |
| mpi-sp.org ↗ | 65* match | Home | Max Planck Institute for Security and Privacy | en | Information and Network Security | – | – | none |
| securitybrief.co.uk ↗ | 65* match | SecurityBrief UK - Technology news for CISOs & cybersecurity decision-makers | United Kingdom en | Information and Network Security | robots | – | none |
| barrymorgan.com ↗ | 65* match | Barry Morgan — Cybersecurity Assessor & Technology Entrepreneur | en | Information and Network Security | robots | – | none |
| cyberchecktools.com ↗ | 65* match | CyberCheckTools — Free Cybersecurity & Privacy Tools | en | Information and Network Security | robots | – | none |
| trustarc.com ↗ | 60* match | Data Privacy Management Software & Solutions | TrustArc | United States~ en | Information and Network SecurityWordPress | robots | phone | none |
| eset.com ↗ | 60* match | ESET Cybersecurity | Enterprise, Business and Home Solutions | ESET | en | Information and Network SecurityTYPO3 | – | – | none |
| fortinet.com ↗ | 60* match | Global Leader of Cybersecurity Solutions and Services | Fortinet | en | Information and Network SecurityAdobe Experience Manager | – | – | none |
| proton.me ↗ | 60* match | Proton: Privacy by default | en | Information and Network Security | robots | – | none |
| truste.com ↗ | 60* match | Data Privacy Management Software & Solutions | TrustArc | United States~ en | Information and Network SecurityWordPress | robots | phone | none |
| acronis.com ↗ | 60* match | AI-Powered Cybersecurity, Data Protection & IT Automation | Acronis | United States~ en | Information and Network SecurityWordPress | – | – | none |
| usercentrics.com ↗ | 60* match | Usercentrics | Leading in Data Privacy & Compliance | en | Information and Network SecurityWordPress | robots | – | none |
| paloaltonetworks.com ↗ | 60* match | Leader in Cybersecurity Protection & Software for the Modern Enterprises - Palo Alto Networks | en | Information and Network SecurityAdobe Experience Manager | robotsllms | – | none |
| watchguard.com ↗ | 60* match | WatchGuard | Comprehensive Cybersecurity Solutions | United States~ en | Information and Network SecurityDrupal | – | – | none |
| iptwins.com ↗ | 60* match | IP Twins: domain names, brand protection & cybersecurity | en | Information and Network SecurityWordPress | robots | – | none |
How the match score works
Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:
- shared topics how many of the same fine‑grained content topics (IAB sub‑categories) both sites cover — the main signal.
- same category whether they sit in the same business / industry category.
- content & title how closely their titles and page descriptions line up in wording and meaning.
No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.