similar sites

Browse

Pricing AI Report

Tools

🚀Submit Your Site to AIPush your URL to AI search engines 🛰️AI Bot ObservatoryEvery AI crawler & who blocks it 📇AI Crawler Database900+ AI user agents + robots.txt gen ⚖️AI Crawler ComparisonCompare two AI crawlers head-to-head 💰AI Licensing / Pay-Per-CrawlWho can charge AI crawlers — Pay-Per-Crawl 🎛️AI Robots.txt Policy BuilderGoal-based robots.txt (cite me, don't train)🤖AI Crawler CheckerSee which AI bots your site blocks 🎯AI Readiness CheckerScore your site 0–100 for AI 🔎Similar Site SearchFind websites like any domain 🔗Backlink CheckerWho links to any site — free All tools →

Browse free →

Sites similar to zonefemmes.com

Zonefemmes alternatives & similar sites

Home — 18 websites ranked by shared content topics, category and on-page relevance.

Each result shows its full tech stack, contacts and AI-policy — not just a name · Browse all sites in Education →

Domain	Match	Title	Country/Lang	Category	AI files	Contact	AI-protection
advanced.agency ↗	60 match 1 shared topics	academie.boutique	fr	education	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
matis.link ↗	60 match 1 shared topics	Le Guide de la Science de Service - IESS \| Service Science \| Guide	fr	education Drupal	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
wildwhimsicalliving.com ↗	60 match 1 shared topics	Waitlist - Sign Up	fr	education Lightspeed	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
medsocialinnovationlab.org ↗	60 match 1 shared topics	TAGHYIR - Mediterranean Co-Production Lab	fr	education WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
missionsbaraka.dev ↗	60 match 1 shared topics	Missions BarakaDev	fr	education	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
moulaison.net ↗	60 match 1 shared topics	Heather Moulaison-Sandy	fr	education	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
calculatrice.now ↗	60 match 1 shared topics	Calculatrices en ligne gratuites \| Calculatrice.now	fr	education	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
centre-robert-schuman.org ↗	60 match 1 shared topics	Accueil \| CERS	fr	education	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
cultureprioritaire.org ↗	60 match 1 shared topics	Présentation \| Culture Prioritaire	fr	education	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
encyclopaedia-universalis.com ↗	60 match 1 shared topics	Le site officiel - Encyclopædia Universalis	fr	education WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
enfantsdumekong.com ↗	60 match 1 shared topics	Parrainez un enfant. L’école peut changer toute sa vie.	fr	education WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
enfantssante.com ↗	60 match 1 shared topics	Santé Bébé	fr	education	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
naulimus.org ↗	60 match 1 shared topics	Naulimus - Naulimus	fr	education WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
netethic.net ↗	60 match 1 shared topics	Netethic - Logiciel de lutte contre le harcèlement scolaire	fr	education WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
247-path-learner.com ↗	60 match 1 shared topics	247 path learner	fr	education WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
aaapr.net ↗	60 match 1 shared topics	Association des anciens et amis de pierre rouge	fr	education	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
aisocietyinstitute.org ↗	60 match 1 shared topics	The AI & Society Institute \| ENS	fr	education Drupal	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
alode-ecoles-francetogo.org ↗	60 match 1 shared topics	Alodé Ecoles France-Togo	fr	education WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

shared topics how many of the same fine‑grained content topics (IAB sub‑categories) both sites cover — the main signal.
same category whether they sit in the same business / industry category.
content & title how closely their titles and page descriptions line up in wording and meaning.

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.