similar sites

Browse

Tools

🚀Submit Your Site to AIPush your URL to AI search engines 🤖AI Crawler CheckerSee which AI bots your site blocks 🎯AI Readiness CheckerScore your site 0–100 for AI 🔗Backlink CheckerWho links to any site — free All tools →

Sites similar to xpbytes.com

Xpbytes alternatives & similar sites

eXPerienced Bytes · XP Bytes — 18 websites ranked by shared content topics, category and on-page relevance.

Each result shows its full tech stack, contacts and AI-policy — not just a name · Browse all sites in Programming Languages →

Domain	Match	Title	Country/Lang	Category	AI files	Contact	AI-protection
mycuteblog.com ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	My Cute Blog - Learn through experience	en	programming-languages WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
kessler.tech ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	- Experiments with Software Development	en	programming-languages WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
kevinnordkvist.dev ↗	63 match 1 shared topics	Kevin Nordkvist \| Full-Stack Developer	en	programming-languages WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	email phone	none
flaviopezzini.com ↗	63 match 1 shared topics	Flavio Pezzini – Expert Software Engineer – Thoughts on software craftsmanship	en	programming-languages WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
karthihegde.dev ↗	63 match 1 shared topics	Karthikey Hegde - Backend & Systems Engineer	en	programming-languages	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
curiouslyrecurringthoughts.com ↗	63 match 1 shared topics	Curiously Recurring Thoughts – Thoughts on Software Engineering	en	programming-languages WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
karelschwab.com ↗	63 match 1 shared topics	Karel Schwab - Software Developer	en	programming-languages	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
codecamps.ch ↗	63 match 1 shared topics	Code Camp \| Coding & Feriencamps in der Schweiz	Switzerland en	programming-languages	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
codecampswiss.ch ↗	63 match 1 shared topics	Code Camp \| Coding & Feriencamps in der Schweiz	Switzerland en	programming-languages	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
codecampworld.ch ↗	63 match 1 shared topics	Code Camp \| Coding & Feriencamps in der Schweiz	Switzerland en	programming-languages	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
miltonmarma.me ↗	63 match 1 shared topics	Milton Marma - miltonmarma.me	en	programming-languages	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
kousenit.org ↗	63 match 1 shared topics	Stuff I've learned recently...	en	programming-languages WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
kslng.org ↗	63 match 1 shared topics	KSL; An experimental programming language	en	programming-languages	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
abenezer.org ↗	63 match 1 shared topics	Abenezer Belachew / Software Developer	en	programming-languages	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	partial · 1
idiosyncratic-ruby.com ↗	63 match 1 shared topics	Idiosyncratic Ruby: Documenting All Ruby Specialities	en	programming-languages	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
mypyfriend.com ↗	63 match 1 shared topics	MyPyFriend	en	programming-languages	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
debragrantoptometrist.co.uk ↗	62 match 1 shared topics	Bytes N Bits – Code, Make, Have Fun	United Kingdom en	programming-languages WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
zorfling.com ↗	62 match 1 shared topics	Chris Colborne	en	programming-languages	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

shared topics how many of the same fine‑grained content topics (IAB sub‑categories) both sites cover — the main signal.
same category whether they sit in the same business / industry category.
content & title how closely their titles and page descriptions line up in wording and meaning.

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.