similar sites

Browse

Tools

🚀Submit Your Site to AIPush your URL to AI search engines 🤖AI Crawler CheckerSee which AI bots your site blocks 🎯AI Readiness CheckerScore your site 0–100 for AI 🔗Backlink CheckerWho links to any site — free All tools →

Sites similar to wplusk.de

Wplusk alternatives & similar sites

Stiftung Wissen+Kompetenzen | — 18 websites ranked by shared content topics, category and on-page relevance.

Each result shows its full tech stack, contacts and AI-policy — not just a name · Browse all sites in Non Profit Organizations →

Domain	Match	Title	Country/Lang	Category	AI files	Contact	AI-protection
modrow-stiftung.de ↗	67 match 1 shared topics	Modrow-Stiftung	Germany de	non-profit-organizations	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
montag-stiftungen.de ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	Montag Stiftungen	Germany de	non-profit-organizations TYPO3	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
ursulawirzstiftung.ch ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	Ursula Wirz-Stiftung - Home	Switzerland de	non-profit-organizations	robotsllmsaihumans	email phone	none
dialogstark.org ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	Home - Stiftung Dialogstark	de	non-profit-organizations WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
bcprivatstiftung.at ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	Privatstiftung - B&C-Gruppe	Austria de	non-profit-organizations WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
moebel-rogg-stiftung.de ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	Möbel Rogg Stiftung	Germany de	non-profit-organizations WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
module-spk-mgl.de ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	Stiftung für das Markgräflerland	Germany de	non-profit-organizations	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
moehler-stiftung-stuttgart.de ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	Homepage Möhler Stiftung	Germany de	non-profit-organizations	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
mossakowski-stiftung.de ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	Home - Mossakowski-Stiftung	Germany de	non-profit-organizations Jimdo	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
aeb-stiftung.com ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	AEB-Stiftung \| Bildung Benachteiligter fördern	de	non-profit-organizations	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
matzen-foundation.com ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	Thomas J.C. und Angelika Matzen Stiftung	de	non-profit-organizations	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
ozeane.com ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	Elbetext – Worte im Fluss \| Stiftungs- und Wissenschaftskommunikation	de	non-profit-organizations WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
mks-heli.de ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	Matthias-Kaufmann-Stiftung – Startseite	Germany de	non-profit-organizations Joomla	robotsllmsaihumans	email phone	none
mksheli.de ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	Matthias-Kaufmann-Stiftung – Startseite	Germany de	non-profit-organizations Joomla	robotsllmsaihumans	email phone	none
feb-stiftung.ch ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	Familie Ernst Basler - Stiftung	Switzerland de	non-profit-organizations	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
mbs-stiftung.org ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	Home - Margarete Breuer Stiftung	de	non-profit-organizations WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
ulmus.ch ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	Stiftung Ulmus – die nachhaltige Stiftung	Switzerland de	non-profit-organizations WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
mogler-stiftung.de ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	Hellmut und Frida Mogler-Stiftung	Germany de	non-profit-organizations WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

shared topics how many of the same fine‑grained content topics (IAB sub‑categories) both sites cover — the main signal.
same category whether they sit in the same business / industry category.
content & title how closely their titles and page descriptions line up in wording and meaning.

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.