similar sites

Browse

Pricing AI Report

Tools

🚀Submit Your Site to AIPush your URL to AI search engines 🛰️AI Bot ObservatoryEvery AI crawler & who blocks it 📇AI Crawler Database900+ AI user agents + robots.txt gen ⚖️AI Crawler ComparisonCompare two AI crawlers head-to-head 💰AI Licensing / Pay-Per-CrawlWho can charge AI crawlers — Pay-Per-Crawl 🎛️AI Robots.txt Policy BuilderGoal-based robots.txt (cite me, don't train)🤖AI Crawler CheckerSee which AI bots your site blocks 🎯AI Readiness CheckerScore your site 0–100 for AI 🔎Similar Site SearchFind websites like any domain 🔗Backlink CheckerWho links to any site — free All tools →

Toplists Browse free →

Sites similar to workstyle.tech

Workstyle alternatives & similar sites

今さら聞けない働き方改革｜短時間でより多くの成果を出す方法とは？ — 18 websites ranked by shared content topics, category and on-page relevance.

Each result shows its full tech stack, contacts and AI-policy — not just a name · Browse all sites in Productivity →

Domain	Match	Title	Country/Lang	Category	AI files	Contact	AI-protection
lifehacker.jp ↗	55 match shared topic	ライフハッカー・ジャパン	Japan ja	productivity	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
eeasy.jp ↗	55 match shared topic	日本No.1 日程調整ツール【eeasy】(イージー)	Japan ja	productivity	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
timerex.net ↗	28 match shared topic	TimeRex - 無料で利用できる日程調整自動化ツール	ja	software-and-applications	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
jicoo.com ↗	28 match shared topic	Jicoo（ジクー） \| チームの成長を加速する日程調整ツール	ja	software-and-applications	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
counselor-pro.net ↗	28 match shared topic	カウンセラー｜目標設定評価	ja	software-and-applications	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
implem.co.jp ↗	28 match shared topic	株式会社インプリム \| OSSのノーコード・ローコード開発ツール「プリザンター」	Japan ja	software-and-applications	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
trello.com ↗	55 match shared topic	Capture, organize, and tackle your to-dos from anywhere	en	productivity	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
doodle.com ↗	55 match shared topic	Free online meeting scheduling tool \| Doodle	en	productivity	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
larksuite.com ↗	55 match shared topic	Lark \| Productivity Superapp for Chat, Meetings, Docs & Projects	en	productivity	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
scrapbox.io ↗	55 match shared topic	Cosense - Share Experience, Make Co-sense, and Go！	en	productivity	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
todoist.com ↗	55 match shared topic	Todoist \| A To-Do List to Organize Your Work & Life	en	productivity	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
omnigroup.com ↗	55 match shared topic	The Omni Group	en	productivity	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
aippt.cn ↗	55 match shared topic	AiPPT - Ai一键生成PPT-PPT制作-Ai助手	China zh	productivity	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
anotepad.com ↗	55 match shared topic	Online Notepad - Take Notes and Share Notes Online	en	productivity	robots llmsaihumans	emailphone	none
worksmobile.com ↗	55 match shared topic	네이버웍스, 일이 쉬워진다	ko	productivity WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
ayoa.com ↗	55 match shared topic	Mind Mapping & Productivity Software \| Create Online Mind Maps with Ayoa	en	productivity WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
officeplus.cn ↗	55 match shared topic	PPT模板 - PPT模板免费下载 - 免费PPT模板下载 - 微软officePLUS	China zh	productivity	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
zxgj.cn ↗	55 match shared topic	在线工具网(zxgj.cn) - 工作生活好帮手	China zh	productivity	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

shared topics how many of the same fine‑grained content topics (IAB sub‑categories) both sites cover — the main signal.
same category whether they sit in the same business / industry category.
content & title how closely their titles and page descriptions line up in wording and meaning.

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.