Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfilePricingAI ReportBrowse free →

Sites similar to willmakley.dev

Willmakley alternatives & similar sites

William Manahan-Makley | Self-motivated and experienced software engineer with a wide variety of experience in all aspects of software development. I love my family, using my skills to help others, learning, and Yoga. — 18 websites ranked by shared content topics, category and on-page relevance.

Each result shows its full tech stack, contacts and AI-policy — not just a name · Browse all sites in Technology And Computing →

DomainMatchTitleCountry/LangCategoryAI filesContactAI-protection
d9rick.org 68 match
2 shared topics
Derick Walker — Software Engineer | USC Computer Science en programming-languages robotsllmsaihumans emailphone none
francgs.dev 67 match
2 shared topics
Francisco Gonzalez - Tech Lead and Senior Software Developer with 9 years of experience. en programming-languages robotsllmsaihumans emailphone none
ahmedelgendy.tech 67 match
2 shared topics
Ahmed El Gendy - Software Engineer & Android Developer en programming-languages robotsllmsaihumans emailphone partial · 8
davidfaux.com 67 match
2 shared topics
David Faux - Full Stack Developer and Software Development Manager en technology-and-computing robotsllmsaihumans emailphone none
mdornseif.io 67 match
2 shared topics
Dr. Maximillian Dornseif - Exploring the World of Software Development en programming-languages robotsllmsaihumans emailphone none
freshman.tech 67 match
2 shared topics
Freshman — Articles and Tutorials on Software Development en technology-and-computing robotsllmsaihumans emailphone none
ziggyrafiq.com 66 match
2 shared topics
Ziggy Rafiq: Software Engineer Lead, Author & Mentor | Craft Clean, Cost-Effective Applications en technology-and-computing robotsllmsaihumans emailphone none
duras.me 66 match
2 shared topics
Jakub Duras - Software Engineer en technology-and-computing robotsllmsaihumans emailphone none
softwareengineering.blog 66 match
2 shared topics
Home - Software Engineering en programming-languagesWordPress robotsllmsaihumans emailphone none
dev-concepts.dev 66 match
2 shared topics
Dev Concepts - Software Development e-books en technology-and-computingGumroad robotsllmsaihumans emailphone none
thatbrothacodes.com 66 match
2 shared topics
thatbrothacodes | Software development from a brotha's perspective en technology-and-computingWordPress robotsllmsaihumans emailphone none
davidamaefula.com 66 match
2 shared topics
David Amaefula | Software Engineer en technology-and-computing robotsllmsaihumans emailphone none
deanpoulin.com 66 match
2 shared topics
Dean Poulin – UI Developer, Full Stack Software Engineer, AngularJS, React, Java, Open Source en programming-languagesWordPress robotsllmsaihumans emailphone none
deepinthecode.com 66 match
2 shared topics
Deep in the Code - Adventures in Software Development ... by David Young en technology-and-computingWordPress robotsllmsaihumans emailphone none
zhangineer.com 66 match
2 shared topics
Sascha´s Thoughts – Student and aspiring software engineer sharing projects, systems thinking, and reflections on building. en technology-and-computingWordPressWooCommerce robotsllmsaihumans emailphone none
kenethkipyegon.com 66 match
2 shared topics
Rooted in Curiosity – Keneth Kipyegon | Software Engineer & Tech Blogger en programming-languages robotsllmsaihumans emailphone none
the-boris.com 66 match
2 shared topics
Boris Testov | Senior Software Engineer en technology-and-computing robotsllmsaihumans emailphone partial · 8
wangandrew.dev 66 match
2 shared topics
Andrew Wang | Software Developer en technology-and-computing robotsllmsaihumans emailphone none

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.