Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfilePricingAI ReportBrowse free →

Sites similar to who.int

Who alternatives & similar sites

World Health Organization (WHO) — 9 websites ranked by shared content topics, category and on-page relevance.

Each result shows its full tech stack, contacts and AI-policy — not just a name · Browse all sites in Brain And Nervous System Disorders →

DomainMatchTitleCountry/LangCategoryAI filesContactAI-protection
cdc.gov 100 match
1,246 shared linkers
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention | CDC en infectious-diseases robotsllmsaihumans emailphone none
unfpa.org 35 match
79 shared linkers
United Nations Population Fund en reproductive-healthDrupal robotsllmsaihumans emailphone none
chinacdc.cn 34 match
72 shared linkers
中国疾病预防控制中心 China zh infectious-diseases robotsllmsaihumans emailphone none
nice.org.uk 31 match
80 shared linkers
Homepage | NICE United Kingdom en medical-healthStoryblok robotsllmsaihumans emailphone none
bmj.com 31 match
155 shared linkers
The BMJ: Leading Medical Research, News, Education, Opinion en medical-healthWordPress robotsllmsaihumans emailphone none
themeruby.com 30 match
172 shared linkers
Premium WordPress News/Magazine Themes from ThemeRuby en web-design-and-htmlWordPress robotsllmsaihumans emailphone partial · 8
un.org 29 match
292 shared linkers
Welcome to the United Nations en children-s-games-and-toys robotsllmsaihumans emailphone none
healthline.com 23 match
164 shared linkers
Healthline: Medical information and health advice you can trust. en medical-healthWordPress robotsllmsaihumans emailphone none
cancer.gov 23 match
87 shared linkers
Comprehensive Cancer Information - NCI en cancer robotsllmsaihumans emailphone none

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.