similar sites

Browse

Pricing AI Report

Tools

🚀Submit Your Site to AIPush your URL to AI search engines 🛰️AI Bot ObservatoryEvery AI crawler & who blocks it 📇AI Crawler Database900+ AI user agents + robots.txt gen ⚖️AI Crawler ComparisonCompare two AI crawlers head-to-head 💰AI Licensing / Pay-Per-CrawlWho can charge AI crawlers — Pay-Per-Crawl 🎛️AI Robots.txt Policy BuilderGoal-based robots.txt (cite me, don't train)🤖AI Crawler CheckerSee which AI bots your site blocks 🎯AI Readiness CheckerScore your site 0–100 for AI 🔎Similar Site SearchFind websites like any domain 🔗Backlink CheckerWho links to any site — free All tools →

Browse free →

Sites similar to whitev.wiki

Whitev alternatives & similar sites

Alton Sanford White V — 18 websites ranked by shared content topics, category and on-page relevance.

Each result shows its full tech stack, contacts and AI-policy — not just a name · Browse all sites in Technology And Computing →

Domain	Match	Title	Country/Lang	Category	AI files	Contact	AI-protection
docker101.com ↗	62 match 2 shared topics	Docker 101	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
zironstatus.com ↗	62 match 2 shared topics	Ziron Status	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
kube.archi ↗	62 match 2 shared topics	Kube Architect	en	cloud-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
deesanas.com ↗	62 match 2 shared topics	Dee Sanas Blog	en	cloud-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
rinarakaki.com ↗	61 match 2 shared topics	Rin Arakaki, Architect	en	cloud-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	email phone	none
simonscholz.dev ↗	61 match 2 shared topics	Software Architecture & Backend Engineering — Simon Scholz	Germany~ en	cloud-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	partial · 8
melchersman.com ↗	61 match 2 shared topics	Melchersman \| System Architect	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
vn-architect.com ↗	61 match 2 shared topics	Victor Nazarenko. Solutions Architect	en	technology-and-computing WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
simonsabin.me ↗	61 match 2 shared topics	Simon Sabin - London, United Kingdom, Sabin.io, University of Nottingham \| about.me	en	cloud-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
aaroncjohnson.com ↗	61 match 2 shared topics	Aaron Johnson – Technical Architect	en	cloud-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
abcisse-cv.com ↗	61 match 2 shared topics	Aly-Bocar Cissé - Software Architect	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
devarchitects.io ↗	61 match 2 shared topics	Cloud Innovation Partner \| Devarchitects	en	cloud-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	partial · 8
divys.org ↗	61 match 2 shared topics	Divys - Elite Backend & DevOps Engineering	en	cloud-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
dnwest.dev ↗	61 match 2 shared topics	Dnwest • Senior Cloud & Backend Architect	en	cloud-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
forstner.dev ↗	61 match 2 shared topics	Martin Forstner \| Lead Software Architect	en	cloud-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
beeteq.com ↗	61 match 2 shared topics	BeeTeq — Serkan \| Solution Architect	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
kenrossato.dev ↗	61 match 2 shared topics	Ken Rossato - Consultant and Architect	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
rgolab.com ↗	61 match 2 shared topics	Rafał Gołąb - DevOps & Cloud Architect	en	cloud-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

shared topics how many of the same fine‑grained content topics (IAB sub‑categories) both sites cover — the main signal.
same category whether they sit in the same business / industry category.
content & title how closely their titles and page descriptions line up in wording and meaning.

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.