similar sites

Browse

Tools

🚀Submit Your Site to AIPush your URL to AI search engines 🤖AI Crawler CheckerSee which AI bots your site blocks 🎯AI Readiness CheckerScore your site 0–100 for AI 🔗Backlink CheckerWho links to any site — free All tools →

Sites similar to weiklim.com

Weiklim alternatives & similar sites

Wei Lim | I’m Wei Lim, a software developer based in Seattle. I will be sharing my experiences on software. — 18 websites ranked by shared content topics, category and on-page relevance.

Each result shows its full tech stack, contacts and AI-policy — not just a name · Browse all sites in Software And Applications →

Domain	Match	Title	Country/Lang	Category	AI files	Contact	AI-protection
jason-erb.com ↗	69 match 2 shared topics	Jason Erb \| Software Development	en	software-and-applications	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
jasontoms.com ↗	67 match 2 shared topics	Jason Toms - App Developer & Engineering Manager	en	software-and-applications	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
deruloop.dev ↗	66 match 2 shared topics	iOS Developer Portfolio \| Swift & SwiftUI Expert	en	software-and-applications	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
jasethehackman.com ↗	66 match 2 shared topics	Jase Hackman The Software Developer	en	software-and-applications	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
masnun.com ↗	66 match 2 shared topics	Abu Ashraf Masnun - Tales of a software craftsman	en	software-and-applications WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
jackrat.dev ↗	65 match 2 shared topics	Jack Ratermann - Student, Software Developer	en	programming-languages	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
aikoschurmann.com ↗	65 match 2 shared topics	Aiko Schurmann \| Software Engineer	en	programming-languages	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
janjanovec.dev ↗	65 match 2 shared topics	Jan Janovec \| Mobile App Developer	en	software-and-applications	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
jay-portfolio.dev ↗	65 match 2 shared topics	JungWon JUNG \| iOS Developer	en	software-and-applications	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
thibaultklein.com ↗	65 match 2 shared topics	Thibault Klein – Thibault's Software Engineering Blog	en	programming-languages WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
agiletracksoftware.com ↗	65 match 2 shared topics	"AgileTrack Software, LLC - Agile/Extreme Programming Tools"	en	software-and-applications	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
sbryu.com ↗	65 match 2 shared topics	Ryu - iOS App Developer \| Ryu	en	software-and-applications	robots llmsaihumans	emailphone	none
boldingsoftware.com ↗	65 match 2 shared topics	Bolding Software	en	programming-languages	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
scalbatty.com ↗	64 match 2 shared topics	Pascal Batty - iOS Developer	en	software-and-applications	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
jedsoft.org ↗	64 match 2 shared topics	John E. Davis Software	en	software-and-applications	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
dgrigorovich.com ↗	64 match 2 shared topics	Dmitry Grigorovich \| Senior Software Engineer	en	programming-languages	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
ahsankabir.dev ↗	64 match 2 shared topics	Ahsan Kabir — Android Developer & Kotlin Enthusiast	en	software-and-applications	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
mcoding.io ↗	64 match 2 shared topics	mCoding - Software consulting, contracting, and training with James Murphy	en	software-and-applications	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

shared topics how many of the same fine‑grained content topics (IAB sub‑categories) both sites cover — the main signal.
same category whether they sit in the same business / industry category.
content & title how closely their titles and page descriptions line up in wording and meaning.

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.