similar sites

Browse

Pricing AI Report

Tools

🚀Submit Your Site to AIPush your URL to AI search engines 🤖AI Crawler CheckerSee which AI bots your site blocks 🎯AI Readiness CheckerScore your site 0–100 for AI 🔗Backlink CheckerWho links to any site — free All tools →

Sites similar to weekinpapers.com

Weekinpapers alternatives & similar sites

This Week In Computer Science Papers — 18 websites ranked by shared content topics, category and on-page relevance.

Each result shows its full tech stack, contacts and AI-policy — not just a name · Browse all sites in Technology And Computing →

Domain	Match	Title	Country/Lang	Category	AI files	Contact	AI-protection
thisweekinraycast.com ↗	72 match 2 shared topics	This Week in Raycast	en	artificial-intelligence	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
thisweekinza.com ↗	71 match 2 shared topics	This Week In Za	en	artificial-intelligence	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
cs-trends.com ↗	70 match 2 shared topics	Computer Science Trends \| Catch up with us!	en	technology-and-computing Drupal	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
thisweek.ai ↗	66 match 2 shared topics	This Week in AI - Weekly Newsletter and AI News App \| This Week in AI - Weekly Newsletter	en	artificial-intelligence	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
thomaswileman.com ↗	65 match 2 shared topics	Thomas Wileman - Machine Learning & Data Science	en	artificial-intelligence	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
ceslab.org ↗	64 match 2 shared topics	CES-Lab - Computer and Embedded Systems Laboratory \| ENIS University of Sfax	en	artificial-intelligence	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
csart-world.com ↗	64 match 2 shared topics	CSART – Computer Simulation & Advanced Research Technologies	en	technology-and-computing WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
topwhitepapers.com ↗	64 match 2 shared topics	TopWhitepapers \| Latest B2B whitepaper \| Tech Trends	en	technology-and-computing WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
luxprovide.com ↗	64 match 2 shared topics	Supercomputing (HPC) Capabilities - LuxProvide	en	artificial-intelligence WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
bakrouairem.com ↗	64 match 2 shared topics	Bakr Ouairem — Data Scientist & Software Engineer Portfolio	en	artificial-intelligence WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
spontaneoussymmetry.com ↗	63 match 2 shared topics	George Lewis - Programmer, Data Scientist, Physicist	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
mchisty.com ↗	63 match 2 shared topics	M Chisty – Java Blog – Distributed Computing	en	artificial-intelligence WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
luvmakin.dev ↗	63 match 2 shared topics	luv makin	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
theydo.com ↗	63 match 2 shared topics	TheyDo — The Experience Context Platform	Netherlands~ en	artificial-intelligence Storyblok	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
oneweekmvp.dev ↗	63 match 2 shared topics	OneWeekMVP — Ship Your MVP in One Week	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
thismonthinai.com ↗	63 match 2 shared topics	This Month In AI - See what's happening in AI	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
apimatic.io ↗	63 match 2 shared topics	APIMatic - Complete OpenAPI SDK Generation Platform	en	technology-and-computing HubSpot	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
thiagosuzuki.com ↗	63 match 2 shared topics	Thiago Suzuki	en	artificial-intelligence WordPress	robots llmsaihumans	emailphone	none

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

shared topics how many of the same fine‑grained content topics (IAB sub‑categories) both sites cover — the main signal.
same category whether they sit in the same business / industry category.
content & title how closely their titles and page descriptions line up in wording and meaning.

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.