similar sites

Browse

Tools

🚀Submit Your Site to AIPush your URL to AI search engines 🤖AI Crawler CheckerSee which AI bots your site blocks 🎯AI Readiness CheckerScore your site 0–100 for AI 🔗Backlink CheckerWho links to any site — free All tools →

Sites similar to webrec.app

Webrec alternatives & similar sites

Webrec - Session Recording & Replay — 18 websites ranked by shared content topics, category and on-page relevance.

Each result shows its full tech stack, contacts and AI-policy — not just a name · Browse all sites in Technology And Computing →

Domain	Match	Title	Country/Lang	Category	AI files	Contact	AI-protection
mbsonboarding.com ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	Onboarding Question Hub	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
meetingtranscriptionapi.com ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	Teams Meeting Recorder \| By Meeting Baas 🐟	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
2martian.com ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	2Martian \| Building Digital Experiences	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
sisprerecord.com ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	STEM in Stilettos Radio Show Pre-Record Schedule	en	technology-and-computing Lightspeed	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	partial · 8
loadgen.be ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	LoadGen - All-in-One Performance Testing & Monitoring \| EUC/VDI	Belgium en	technology-and-computing	robots llmsaihumans	emailphone	none
boringengineer.com ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	Boring Engineer	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	partial · 8
devbyrad.com ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	Radhika \| Software Development Professional \| 15+ Years Experience	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
massivescale.com ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	The World According to Marc	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
7thcolumn.org ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	Portfolio of Experience and Passion Projects \| Jacob Hopkins	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
marxdatascience.com ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	Marx Data Science	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
jamesconway.dev ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	James Conway Portfolio - Senior IT Professional in Denver, CO	United States~ en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
address-normalization.com ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	Automated Geocoding & Address Normalization Pipelines	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
aetherial.tech ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	Aetherial \| Engineering the Sublime	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
ovieh.com ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	Ovieh Mosley \| Brewing Up Code	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	partial · 8
scalarpivot.com ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	Scalar Pivot \| Decision Intelligence for Everyday Trade-Offs	en	technology-and-computing WordPress	robots llmsaihumans	emailphone	none
thisdomain.dev ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	Jon C. Phillips – Building Products / Growing Audiences / Crafting Experiences	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
889993559.xyz ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	Exploring Technology Trends and Digital Innovation Insights	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
jargons.dev ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	Jargons.dev - Simplified Meaning & Definition to Technical Terms	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

shared topics how many of the same fine‑grained content topics (IAB sub‑categories) both sites cover — the main signal.
same category whether they sit in the same business / industry category.
content & title how closely their titles and page descriptions line up in wording and meaning.

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.