similar sites

Browse

Tools

🚀Submit Your Site to AIPush your URL to AI search engines 🤖AI Crawler CheckerSee which AI bots your site blocks 🎯AI Readiness CheckerScore your site 0–100 for AI 🔗Backlink CheckerWho links to any site — free All tools →

Sites similar to webnetproject.com

Webnetproject alternatives & similar sites

Kai Uwe Pel - High-Performance Engineering for X-Plane & HPC — 18 websites ranked by shared content topics, category and on-page relevance.

Each result shows its full tech stack, contacts and AI-policy — not just a name · Browse all sites in Technology And Computing →

Domain	Match	Title	Country/Lang	Category	AI files	Contact	AI-protection
silvacms.org ↗	71 match 1 shared topics	Silvacms - Engineering high-performance digital workflows	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
dhineshperf.dev ↗	68 match 1 shared topics	Dhineshbabu Muthuraj \| Sr. Performance Engineer	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
jetgraph.io ↗	68 match 1 shared topics	JetGraph — High-Performance In-Memory Graph Engine Built in Rust	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
oxideworks.com ↗	68 match 1 shared topics	Oxideworks \| High-Performance Rust Systems	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
jamesfrommontana.com ↗	67 match 1 shared topics	An engineering blog for the rest of us	en	technology-and-computing Ghost	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
scalereliant.com ↗	67 match 1 shared topics	Scale Reliant – SRE & Platform Engineering for Growing Teams	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
mcadam.dev ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	Data Science & Software Engineering - Mark Mcadam	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
boosteng.com ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	Boost Engineering	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
memeticengineering.ai ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	Memetic Engineering	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
7pm.dev ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	7pm.dev \| Engineering Leader	en	technology-and-computing	robots llmsaihumans	emailphone	none
tombenner.co ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	Tom Benner \| Engineering Leader	Colombia en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
aecengineering.org ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	aecengineering	en	technology-and-computing WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
boringengineer.com ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	Boring Engineer	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	partial · 8
treq.co ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	Quantum Systems Engineering - TreQ	Colombia en	technology-and-computing WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
jackhumphrey.me ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	Jack Humphrey, Engineering Leader	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
dgtlx.com ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	DGTLX \| Experience engineering for customers and users of digital, mobile, social, and search.	en	technology-and-computing WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
csetx.org ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	Computer Science and Engineering Transactions	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
jamesrarthur.com ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	James R. Arthur \| Software Engineering Leader	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

shared topics how many of the same fine‑grained content topics (IAB sub‑categories) both sites cover — the main signal.
same category whether they sit in the same business / industry category.
content & title how closely their titles and page descriptions line up in wording and meaning.

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.