similar sites

Browse

Pricing AI Report

Tools

🚀Submit Your Site to AIPush your URL to AI search engines 🤖AI Crawler CheckerSee which AI bots your site blocks 🎯AI Readiness CheckerScore your site 0–100 for AI 🔗Backlink CheckerWho links to any site — free All tools →

Sites similar to webfranklin.com

Webfranklin alternatives & similar sites

Franklin Recruiting Group — 18 websites ranked by shared content topics, category and on-page relevance.

Each result shows its full tech stack, contacts and AI-policy — not just a name · Browse all sites in Human Resources →

Domain	Match	Title	Country/Lang	Category	AI files	Contact	AI-protection
360recruit.org ↗	68 match 2 shared topics	360 · recruit	en	human-resources	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
cane-recruitment.com ↗	67 match 2 shared topics	CaNe Recruitment	en	human-resources	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
blackowlrecruiting.net ↗	67 match 2 shared topics	BLACK OWL RECRUITING, LLC. - Hiring Made Easy!	en	human-resources WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
lydiarecruitment.com ↗	67 match 2 shared topics	Lydia Recruitment	en	human-resources WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
2rrecruiting.com ↗	67 match 2 shared topics	Home \| Rapid Reliable Recruiting \| United States	en	human-resources Wix	robots llmsaihumans	emailphone	none
atwork.com ↗	66 match 2 shared topics	Professional Staffing and Recruiting Agency - AtWork	en	human-resources WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
bahrindo.com ↗	66 match 2 shared topics	Indonesian recruitment agency	en	human-resources	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
imrecruitments.com ↗	66 match 2 shared topics	Emloyment Recruitment	en	human-resources WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	email phone	none
corerecruitmentinc.com ↗	66 match 2 shared topics	Core Recruitment Inc.,	en	human-resources WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	email phone	none
2fawcett.com ↗	66 match 2 shared topics	2fawcett – Empowering Recruitment	en	human-resources WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
mbsprostaffing.com ↗	65 match 2 shared topics	Staffing & Recruiting Agency in Cincinnati, OH - MBS Pro Staffing	en	human-resources WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
springbornstaffing.com ↗	65 match 2 shared topics	Springborn Staffing: Maine’s Top Recruiting Partner Since 1987	en	human-resources	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
totalrecruitmentgroup.com ↗	65 match 2 shared topics	Total Recruitment Group \| Recruitment Agency Glasgow Clydebank	en	human-resources WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
topindustrialtalent.com ↗	65 match 2 shared topics	Top Industrial Talent \| Industrial Equipment Recruiting & Executive Search	en	human-resources	robots llmsaihumans	emailphone	none
blackhardstone.com ↗	64 match 2 shared topics	BLACKHARDSTONE \| recruitment services	en	human-resources Wix	robots llmsaihumans	emailphone	none
toptiertalentees.com ↗	64 match 2 shared topics	Top Tier Talentees \| Recruitment Specialists	en	human-resources	robotsllmsaihumans	email phone	partial · 8
core-staffingsolutions.com ↗	64 match 2 shared topics	Core Staffing Solutions \| Engineering Recruitment Agency	en	human-resources Wix	robots llmsaihumans	emailphone	none
corestaffing-solutions.com ↗	64 match 2 shared topics	Core Staffing Solutions \| Engineering Recruitment Agency	en	human-resources Wix	robots llmsaihumans	emailphone	none

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

shared topics how many of the same fine‑grained content topics (IAB sub‑categories) both sites cover — the main signal.
same category whether they sit in the same business / industry category.
content & title how closely their titles and page descriptions line up in wording and meaning.

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.