similar sites

Browse

Pricing AI Report

Tools

🚀Submit Your Site to AIPush your URL to AI search engines 🤖AI Crawler CheckerSee which AI bots your site blocks 🎯AI Readiness CheckerScore your site 0–100 for AI 🔗Backlink CheckerWho links to any site — free All tools →

Sites similar to web-jj.com

Web Jj alternatives & similar sites

Jong Jin Kim – All right reserved — 18 websites ranked by shared content topics, category and on-page relevance.

Each result shows its full tech stack, contacts and AI-policy — not just a name · Browse all sites in Technology And Computing →

Domain	Match	Title	Country/Lang	Category	AI files	Contact	AI-protection
balabuilds.com ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	Bala Vinaithirthan – Portfolio / Research	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
spindoctor.dev ↗	63 match 1 shared topics	Spin Doctor – An open-source Combadge Server	en	technology-and-computing WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
ace.kim ↗	63 match 1 shared topics	ace.kim – I can't believe I got this domain name	en	technology-and-computing WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
imsotight.com ↗	63 match 1 shared topics	Im So Tight – Digital Innovation	en	technology-and-computing WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
adamsthoughts.technology ↗	63 match 1 shared topics	Adam's Thoughts – My thoughts on the world of tech! All posts are my own and do not represent my employer.	en	technology-and-computing WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
larrywright.me ↗	63 match 1 shared topics	Larry Wright	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
adamnorton.blog ↗	63 match 1 shared topics	Acuity – A place to refine thought and gain clarity.	en	technology-and-computing WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
100storypoints.com ↗	63 match 1 shared topics	100 Story Points – That's all you get	en	technology-and-computing WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
server-1.eu ↗	63 match 1 shared topics	Server-1	European Union en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
laoutaris.info ↗	63 match 1 shared topics	Personal homepage – Researcher & Innovator	en	technology-and-computing WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
4bright.com ↗	63 match 1 shared topics	Bright Technologies \| Dedicated to Performance	en	technology-and-computing Joomla	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
sampotasz.com ↗	63 match 1 shared topics	Sam Potasznik – Making products that serve.	en	technology-and-computing Spree Commerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
mblum6180.com ↗	63 match 1 shared topics	Matthew Blum – Artist and Creative Technologist	en	technology-and-computing WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
mcpevals.ai ↗	63 match 1 shared topics	MCP Eval - Test Your MCP Server	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
corselloresearch.com ↗	63 match 1 shared topics	Corsello Research	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
365calling.com ↗	62 match 1 shared topics	Unleash Call Routing for Microsoft Teams \| Contango	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
lycee-mandaille.com ↗	62 match 1 shared topics	Lycee-M – Science & Technology	en	technology-and-computing WordPress	robots llmsaihumans	emailphone	partial · 8
sandlotzero.com ↗	62 match 1 shared topics	Sandlot Zero	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

shared topics how many of the same fine‑grained content topics (IAB sub‑categories) both sites cover — the main signal.
same category whether they sit in the same business / industry category.
content & title how closely their titles and page descriptions line up in wording and meaning.

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.