similar sites

Browse

Pricing AI Report

Tools

🚀Submit Your Site to AIPush your URL to AI search engines 🤖AI Crawler CheckerSee which AI bots your site blocks 🎯AI Readiness CheckerScore your site 0–100 for AI 🔗Backlink CheckerWho links to any site — free All tools →

Sites similar to weasdown.com

Weasdown alternatives & similar sites

William Easdown Babb – Space, photography and projects galore — 18 websites ranked by shared content topics, category and on-page relevance.

Each result shows its full tech stack, contacts and AI-policy — not just a name · Browse all sites in Technology And Computing →

Domain	Match	Title	Country/Lang	Category	AI files	Contact	AI-protection
markinfo.dev ↗	66 match 2 shared topics	Computer Information and Projects	en	programming-languages	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
wbsantos.com ↗	63 match 2 shared topics	Home - William Barbosa	en	technology-and-computing WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
wcowley.com ↗	63 match 2 shared topics	Home \| William Cowley	en	programming-languages	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
izix.org ↗	63 match 2 shared topics	SETEC Astronomy Project	en	programming-languages	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
galtzo.com ↗	63 match 2 shared topics	Open Source & Source Available Projects	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
sblevins.com ↗	63 match 2 shared topics	Sterling's Project Blog	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
melinazach.org ↗	63 match 2 shared topics	Melina Zach's Project Portal	en	programming-languages	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
schneems.com ↗	63 match 2 shared topics	Schneems - Programming Practices, Performance, and Pedantry	en	programming-languages	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
agilecoding.io ↗	62 match 2 shared topics	AgileCoding.io - connecting agile project management with coding and all it takes around it	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
mariolueder.com ↗	62 match 2 shared topics	Code, Algorithms and Probabilities \| Engineering Blog - Mario Lüder	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
javaprofile.org ↗	62 match 2 shared topics	Java Profile – Its about Java, Profile, and so much more!	en	programming-languages WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
jdh8.org ↗	62 match 2 shared topics	Taipei Forcing Club – Computer science and contract bridge	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
deniscapeto.com ↗	62 match 2 shared topics	Denis Capeto – Coding and having fun!	en	programming-languages WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
jdoyle.io ↗	62 match 2 shared topics	A Programmer's Ramblings - Just some thoughts I wrote down to help future me and maybe you	en	programming-languages	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
ahlaka.com ↗	62 match 2 shared topics	Ahla – I dream, draw, write and create!	en	programming-languages WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
thrill-project.com ↗	62 match 2 shared topics	Thrill-Project \| The colorful side of code.	en	technology-and-computing WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
0not.net ↗	62 match 2 shared topics	0not -- Programming, hacking, making, and science.	en	programming-languages	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
derk-jan.com ↗	62 match 2 shared topics	Code in Bits and Pieces	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	partial · 8

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

shared topics how many of the same fine‑grained content topics (IAB sub‑categories) both sites cover — the main signal.
same category whether they sit in the same business / industry category.
content & title how closely their titles and page descriptions line up in wording and meaning.

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.