Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfilePricingAI ReportToplistsBrowse free →

Sites similar to wbgt.dev

Wbgt alternatives & similar sites

We Build Good Things | Software Development & Automation — 18 websites ranked by shared content topics, category and on-page relevance.

Each result shows its full tech stack, contacts and AI-policy — not just a name · Browse all sites in Software And Applications →

DomainMatchTitleCountry/LangCategoryAI filesContactAI-protection
reproducible-builds.org 70 match
shared topic
Reproducible Builds — a set of software development practices that create an independently-verifiable path from source to binary code en technology-and-computing robotsllmsaihumans emailphone none
agilemanifesto.org 65 match
shared topic
Manifesto for Agile Software Development en software-and-applications robotsllmsaihumans emailphone none
qt.io 65 match
shared topic
Qt | Tools for Each Stage of Software Development Lifecycle en software-and-applicationsHubSpot robotsllmsaihumans emailphone none
appsytools.com 65 match
shared topic
Software Tools for Work, Design, Marketing, and Development - Appsy Tools (2026) en software-and-applications robotsllmsaihumans emailphone none
iolgenius.com 65 match
shared topic
IOLGenius – Leader in Software and Application Development en software-and-applicationsWordPress robotsllmsaihumans emailphone none
stackdirectory.com 65 match
shared topic
Software Products for Building and Improving Your Stack - Stack Directory (2026) en technology-and-computing robotsllmsaihumans emailphone none
smartkithub.com 65 match
shared topic
Smart Software Products for Building a Better Work Kit - Smart Kit Hub (2026) en software-and-applications robotsllmsaihumans emailphone partial · 8
platformio.org 65 match
shared topic
Your Gateway to Embedded Software Development Excellence · PlatformIO en technology-and-computing robotsllmsaihumans emailphone none
osadl.org 65 match
shared topic
OSADL: OSADL - Open Source Automation Development Lab eG en technology-and-computingTYPO3 robotsllmsaihumans emailphone none
wapice.com 65 match
shared topic
Software development with end-to-end competence | Wapice en software-and-applicationsWordPressReaction Commerce robotsllmsaihumans emailphone none
neeto.com 65 match
shared topic
Neeto builds affordable software en software-and-applications robotsllmsaihumans emailphone none
cedarmountainsoftware.com 65 match
shared topic
Cedar Mountain Software – Good Tech for Nice People en software-and-applicationsWordPress robotsllmsaihumans emailphone partial · 8
tmssoftware.com 65 match
shared topic
TMS Software | VCL, FMX, .NET, LCL, FNC, Cloud components & developer tools for Delphi, C++Builder, Visual Studio, Lazarus en software-and-applications robotsllmsaihumans emailphone none
audienceinsights.net 65 match
shared topic
audienceinsights.net - The blog about mobile software development en technology-and-computingWordPressWooCommerce robotsllmsaihumans emailphone none
classiq.io 65 match
shared topic
Quantum Computing Software| Limitless Development | Classiq en technology-and-computing robotsllmsaihumans emailphone none
gitea.dev 65 match
shared topic
GitHub - go-gitea/gitea: Git with a cup of tea! Painless self-hosted all-in-one software development service, including Git hosting, code review, team collaboration, package registry and CI/CD · GitHub en software-and-applications robotsllmsaihumans emailphone partial · 8
novalys.net 65 match
shared topic
Novalys Software | Supporting Development Teams with innovative softwares en software-and-applications robotsllmsaihumans emailphone none
perspectiveproductions.net 65 match
shared topic
Perspective Productions – Software Development en technology-and-computingWordPress robotsllmsaihumans emailphone none

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.