similar sites

Browse

Pricing AI Report

Tools

🚀Submit Your Site to AIPush your URL to AI search engines 🛰️AI Bot ObservatoryEvery AI crawler & who blocks it 📇AI Crawler Database900+ AI user agents + robots.txt gen ⚖️AI Crawler ComparisonCompare two AI crawlers head-to-head 💰AI Licensing / Pay-Per-CrawlWho can charge AI crawlers — Pay-Per-Crawl 🎛️AI Robots.txt Policy BuilderGoal-based robots.txt (cite me, don't train)🤖AI Crawler CheckerSee which AI bots your site blocks 🎯AI Readiness CheckerScore your site 0–100 for AI 🔎Similar Site SearchFind websites like any domain 🔗Backlink CheckerWho links to any site — free All tools →

Toplists Browse free →

Sites similar to vuhnger.dev

Vuhnger alternatives & similar sites

Victor Uhnger - Portfolio — 18 websites ranked by shared content topics, category and on-page relevance.

Each result shows its full tech stack, contacts and AI-policy — not just a name · Browse all sites in Web Development →

Domain	Match	Title	Country/Lang	Category	AI files	Contact	AI-protection
activeweb.no ↗	18 match shared topic	ActiveWEB AS – Internet by design	Norway no	web-development WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	email phone	none
increo.no ↗	18 match shared topic	Increo - teknologi- og designbyrå i Oslo & Trondheim	Norway no	web-development	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
eredaktor.no ↗	18 match shared topic	eRedaktør publiseringsløsning	Norway no	web-development	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
netlab.no ↗	18 match shared topic	Netlab AS - Webutvikling og Digitale Løsninger	Norway no	web-development	robotsllmsaihumans	email phone	none
digimaker.no ↗	18 match shared topic	Digimaker \| Skreddersydde Nettsider og Webapplikasjoner	Norway no	web-development	robotsllmsaihumans	email phone	none
aplia.no ↗	18 match shared topic	Unike digitale spesialister \| Aplia	Norway no	web-development	robotsllmsaihumans	email phone	none
senson.no ↗	18 match shared topic	Senson AS - WordPress / WooCommerce leverandør	Norway no	web-development WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
pxstudio.no ↗	18 match shared topic	Apputvikling og webutvikling - Pixel Studio	Norway no	web-development WordPress	robots llmsaihumans	email phone	none
seria.no ↗	18 match shared topic	Seria – Systemutvikling	Norway no	web-development WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	email phone	none
openjsf.org ↗	55 match shared topic	A safe and modern home for JavaScript technologies \| OpenJS Foundation	en	programming-languages Prismic	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
reactflow.dev ↗	55 match shared topic	Node-Based UIs in React - React Flow	en	web-development	robots llmsaihumans	emailphone	none
jquery.org ↗	55 match shared topic	A safe and modern home for JavaScript technologies \| OpenJS Foundation	en	programming-languages Prismic	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
developpez.com ↗	55 match shared topic	Developpez.com, le club des développeurs et IT Pro	fr	programming-languages	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
mdxjs.com ↗	55 match shared topic	Markdown for the component era \| MDX	en	web-development	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
handlebarsjs.com ↗	55 match shared topic	Handlebars	en	programming-languages	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
turbo.build ↗	55 match shared topic	Turborepo	en	web-development	robots llmsaihumans	emailphone	none
smarty.net ↗	55 match shared topic	PHP Template Engine \| Smarty	en	programming-languages	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
codezine.jp ↗	55 match shared topic	CodeZine（コードジン）	Japan ja	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

shared topics how many of the same fine‑grained content topics (IAB sub‑categories) both sites cover — the main signal.
same category whether they sit in the same business / industry category.
content & title how closely their titles and page descriptions line up in wording and meaning.

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.