similar sites

Browse

Tools

🚀Submit Your Site to AIPush your URL to AI search engines 🤖AI Crawler CheckerSee which AI bots your site blocks 🎯AI Readiness CheckerScore your site 0–100 for AI 🔗Backlink CheckerWho links to any site — free All tools →

Sites similar to voltaicracer.com

Voltaicracer alternatives & similar sites

Jairam Chandar — 18 websites ranked by shared content topics, category and on-page relevance.

Each result shows its full tech stack, contacts and AI-policy — not just a name · Browse all sites in Technology And Computing →

Domain	Match	Title	Country/Lang	Category	AI files	Contact	AI-protection
volkrin.com ↗	65 match 2 shared topics	Volkrin — Chandru Subramani \| DevOps & Cloud Engineer	en	cloud-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
supercloud.com.br ↗	64 match 2 shared topics	Thiago Lima \| Software Engineer	Brazil en	cloud-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
atiqurrahman.dev ↗	64 match 2 shared topics	Atiqur Rahman \| Software Engineer & System Design Enthusiast	en	cloud-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
atulsingh.io ↗	64 match 2 shared topics	Atul Singh \| Solution Architect	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
eslamhelmy.tech ↗	64 match 2 shared topics	Eslam Helmy — .NET, Azure & Microservices	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
gbengaoni.com ↗	64 match 2 shared topics	Gbenga Oni \| Software & DevOps Engineer	en	cloud-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
hoven.cloud ↗	63 match 2 shared topics	hoven.cloud — On-Demand Infrastructure Engineer	en	cloud-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
erlang-embedded.com ↗	63 match 2 shared topics	Erlang Solutions - Scalable Distributed Technology	en	technology-and-computing WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
hrishi.dev ↗	63 match 2 shared topics	tail -f /home/hrishi/curiosity-and-experience \| Containers and Kubernetes/OpenShift, Distributed systems, Unix/Linux systems, Data structures and algorithms and Cloud computing.	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
gazwald.com ↗	63 match 2 shared topics	Gazwald	en	cloud-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
0xsingh.com ↗	63 match 2 shared topics	Inderdeep Singh \| Backend Engineer • DevOps • SRE	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
namespace.so ↗	63 match 2 shared topics	Accelerate your developer workflow \| Namespace	en	cloud-computing	robots llmsaihumans	emailphone	none
voidnish.com ↗	63 match 2 shared topics	Nish Nishant – Technology & Architecture Leader – Nish’s thoughts on technology leadership, cloud architecture, and APIs, among other things	en	technology-and-computing WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
3xplaa.com ↗	63 match 2 shared topics	3xplaa — Observability primitives for small engineering teams	en	cloud-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	partial · 8
auroracloud.dev ↗	63 match 2 shared topics	Deploy Production-Ready Virtual Chains \| Aurora Cloud	en	cloud-computing DatoCMS	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
naved.me ↗	62 match 2 shared topics	Naved Deshmukh \| Solutions Architect & Software Engineer	en	cloud-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	partial · 8
navigating365.com ↗	62 match 2 shared topics	Navigating 365	en	cloud-computing Ghost	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
aaronhorrell.co.uk ↗	62 match 2 shared topics	Aaron Horrell – Software Engineer	United Kingdom en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

shared topics how many of the same fine‑grained content topics (IAB sub‑categories) both sites cover — the main signal.
same category whether they sit in the same business / industry category.
content & title how closely their titles and page descriptions line up in wording and meaning.

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.