similar sites

Browse

Pricing AI Report

Tools

🚀Submit Your Site to AIPush your URL to AI search engines 🛰️AI Bot ObservatoryEvery AI crawler & who blocks it 📇AI Crawler Database900+ AI user agents + robots.txt gen ⚖️AI Crawler ComparisonCompare two AI crawlers head-to-head 💰AI Licensing / Pay-Per-CrawlWho can charge AI crawlers — Pay-Per-Crawl 🎛️AI Robots.txt Policy BuilderGoal-based robots.txt (cite me, don't train)🤖AI Crawler CheckerSee which AI bots your site blocks 🎯AI Readiness CheckerScore your site 0–100 for AI 🔎Similar Site SearchFind websites like any domain 🔗Backlink CheckerWho links to any site — free All tools →

Toplists Browse free →

Sites similar to visse.nu

Visse alternatives & similar sites

Visse.nu - — 18 websites ranked by shared content topics, category and on-page relevance.

Each result shows its full tech stack, contacts and AI-policy — not just a name · Browse all sites in Politics →

Domain	Match	Title	Country/Lang	Category	AI files	Contact	AI-protection
regeringen.se ↗	55 match shared topic	Startsidan - Regeringen.se	Sweden sv	political-issues-and-policy	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
muf.se ↗	55 match shared topic	Moderata Ungdomsförbundet (MUF)	Sweden sv	political-issues-and-policy WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
piratpartiet.se ↗	55 match shared topic	Piratpartiet – Den digitala tidsålderns politiska kraft	Sweden sv	political-issues-and-policy WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
ui.se ↗	55 match shared topic	UI.se \| Utrikespolitiska institutet	Sweden sv	politics	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
dagenssamhalle.se ↗	37 match shared topic	Dagens Samhälle - Aktuella nyheter	Sweden sv	politics	robotsllmsaihumans	email phone	none
flamman.se ↗	37 match shared topic	Flamman \| Grundad i Malmfälten 1906	Sweden sv	politics WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
dalademokraten.se ↗	37 match shared topic	Dala-Demokraten – Opinion och nyhetsfördjupning	Sweden sv	politics	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	full · 17
mittskifte.org ↗	28 match shared topic	MittSkifte \| namninsamling och kampanj på nätet	sv	politics	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
jamstalldhetsmyndigheten.se ↗	28 match shared topic	Jämställdhetsmyndigheten	Sweden sv	political-issues-and-policy	robotsllmsaihumans	email phone	none
mp.se ↗	28 match shared topic	Miljöpartiet de gröna - Sverige vinner på grön politik	Sweden sv	political-issues-and-policy WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
aftonbladet.se ↗	18 match shared topic	Aftonbladet	Sweden sv	politics	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
mitti.se ↗	18 match shared topic	Mitt i - Nyheter Stockholm	Sweden sv	politics	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
europa.eu ↗	55 match shared topic	Language selection \| European Union	European Union en	politics Drupal	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
centerpartiet.se ↗	18 match shared topic	Centerpartiet	Sweden sv	elections	robotsllmsaihumans	email phone	none
liberalerna.se ↗	18 match shared topic	Liberalerna – Sveriges liberala parti	Sweden sv	politics WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
altinget.se ↗	18 match shared topic	Altinget \| Nyheter, analyser och debatt om svensk politik	Sweden sv	politics	robotsllmsaihumans	email phone	none
vlt.se ↗	18 match shared topic	VLT – Nära dig – dygnet runt	Sweden sv	politics	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
dagensarena.se ↗	18 match shared topic	Dagens Arena \| Oberoende och progressiv	Sweden sv	politics WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

shared topics how many of the same fine‑grained content topics (IAB sub‑categories) both sites cover — the main signal.
same category whether they sit in the same business / industry category.
content & title how closely their titles and page descriptions line up in wording and meaning.

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.