similar sites

Browse

Pricing AI Report

Tools

🚀Submit Your Site to AIPush your URL to AI search engines 🛰️AI Bot ObservatoryEvery AI crawler & who blocks it 📇AI Crawler Database900+ AI user agents + robots.txt gen ⚖️AI Crawler ComparisonCompare two AI crawlers head-to-head 💰AI Licensing / Pay-Per-CrawlWho can charge AI crawlers — Pay-Per-Crawl 🎛️AI Robots.txt Policy BuilderGoal-based robots.txt (cite me, don't train)🤖AI Crawler CheckerSee which AI bots your site blocks 🎯AI Readiness CheckerScore your site 0–100 for AI 🔗Backlink CheckerWho links to any site — free All tools →

Browse free →

Sites similar to veridit.org

Veridit alternatives & similar sites

Veridit as — 18 websites ranked by shared content topics, category and on-page relevance.

Each result shows its full tech stack, contacts and AI-policy — not just a name · Browse all sites in Technology And Computing →

Domain	Match	Title	Country/Lang	Category	AI files	Contact	AI-protection
veridit.biz ↗	100 match 1 shared topics	Veridit as	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
veridit.info ↗	100 match 1 shared topics	Veridit as	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
veric.me ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	vEric:	en	technology-and-computing WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
roadtoarchitect.com ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	The Road To Architect – learning notes about software architecture, system design and others	en	technology-and-computing WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
antipattern.online ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	antipattern mission	en	technology-and-computing WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
meettodo.net ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	assumption of advancement – Blog about software architecture	en	technology-and-computing WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
verifrax.net ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	VERIFRAX	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
veritag.org ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	veriTAG	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
doulkeridis.com ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	Ioannis Doulkeridis	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
bradcurtis.com ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	Brad Curtis	en	technology-and-computing Ghost	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
thelonemaverick.com ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	The Lone Maverick	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
bradirby.com ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	Blog - Brad Irby	en	technology-and-computing WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
blkbull.com ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	BlackBull \| Future-Ready Digital Architecture	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
dorkbox.com ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	dorkbox	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
gulland.com ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	Al Gulland – Data, Analytics and Architecture	en	technology-and-computing WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
bradbytes.com ↗	63 match 1 shared topics	Brad Bytes \| Bytes of IT Strategy, Architecture and Trends	en	technology-and-computing WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
nextorbitalcode.com ↗	63 match 1 shared topics	Next Orbital Code - Engineering Tomorrow's Solutions	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
rjpalombo.com ↗	63 match 1 shared topics	RJPalombo.com - solutions architecture and development	en	technology-and-computing WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

shared topics how many of the same fine‑grained content topics (IAB sub‑categories) both sites cover — the main signal.
same category whether they sit in the same business / industry category.
content & title how closely their titles and page descriptions line up in wording and meaning.

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.