similar sites

Browse

Pricing AI Report

Tools

🚀Submit Your Site to AIPush your URL to AI search engines 🛰️AI Bot ObservatoryEvery AI crawler & who blocks it 📇AI Crawler Database900+ AI user agents + robots.txt gen ⚖️AI Crawler ComparisonCompare two AI crawlers head-to-head 💰AI Licensing / Pay-Per-CrawlWho can charge AI crawlers — Pay-Per-Crawl 🎛️AI Robots.txt Policy BuilderGoal-based robots.txt (cite me, don't train)🤖AI Crawler CheckerSee which AI bots your site blocks 🎯AI Readiness CheckerScore your site 0–100 for AI 🔎Similar Site SearchFind websites like any domain 🔗Backlink CheckerWho links to any site — free All tools →

Browse free →

Sites similar to venner.io

Venner alternatives & similar sites

WilliamVenner (William) · GitHub — 18 websites ranked by shared content topics, category and on-page relevance.

Each result shows its full tech stack, contacts and AI-policy — not just a name · Browse all sites in Technology And Computing →

Domain	Match	Title	Country/Lang	Category	AI files	Contact	AI-protection
williamsbrown.dev ↗	81 match 1 shared topics	williamsalmeida (Williams Almeida) · GitHub	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
willforbes.dev ↗	80 match 1 shared topics	WilliamForbesJr (Will Forbes) · GitHub	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
willbuckingham.dev ↗	79 match 1 shared topics	willbuckingham (Will Buckingham) · GitHub	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
willyrgf.com ↗	79 match 1 shared topics	willyrgf (Willy Romão) · GitHub	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
beduncs.com ↗	77 match 1 shared topics	beduncs (Ben) · GitHub	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
gitapedia.com ↗	76 match 1 shared topics	Gitapedia · GitHub	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
kevinejohn.com ↗	76 match 1 shared topics	kevinejohn (KJ) · GitHub	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
dbgenis.com ↗	76 match 1 shared topics	davege1107 (David) · GitHub	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
debugme.dev ↗	76 match 1 shared topics	claytonfuselier (Clayton) · GitHub	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
mechanized.net ↗	76 match 1 shared topics	BrianFrisch · GitHub	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
bennettrj.com ↗	76 match 1 shared topics	bennettj12 (Bennett Johnson) · GitHub	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
kharding.com ↗	75 match 1 shared topics	klutchell (Kyle Harding) · GitHub	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
startoni.cloud ↗	75 match 1 shared topics	loganstartoni (Logan) · GitHub	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
gilhyeon.dev ↗	75 match 1 shared topics	GilHyeon (Gilhyeon Hong) · GitHub	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
sruffell.net ↗	75 match 1 shared topics	sruffell (Shaun Ruffell) · GitHub	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
alexf0x.dev ↗	75 match 1 shared topics	alexf0xdev (alexf0xdev) · GitHub	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
aasan.dev ↗	75 match 1 shared topics	kennethaasan (Kenneth Aasan) · GitHub	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	partial · 8
gisbook.com ↗	75 match 1 shared topics	glennon (Alan Glennon) · GitHub	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

shared topics how many of the same fine‑grained content topics (IAB sub‑categories) both sites cover — the main signal.
same category whether they sit in the same business / industry category.
content & title how closely their titles and page descriptions line up in wording and meaning.

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.