similar sites

Browse

Pricing AI Report

Tools

🚀Submit Your Site to AIPush your URL to AI search engines 🛰️AI Bot ObservatoryEvery AI crawler & who blocks it 📇AI Crawler Database900+ AI user agents + robots.txt gen ⚖️AI Crawler ComparisonCompare two AI crawlers head-to-head 💰AI Licensing / Pay-Per-CrawlWho can charge AI crawlers — Pay-Per-Crawl 🎛️AI Robots.txt Policy BuilderGoal-based robots.txt (cite me, don't train)🤖AI Crawler CheckerSee which AI bots your site blocks 🎯AI Readiness CheckerScore your site 0–100 for AI 🔎Similar Site SearchFind websites like any domain 🔗Backlink CheckerWho links to any site — free All tools →

Toplists Browse free →

Sites similar to uri.edu

Uri alternatives & similar sites

The University of Rhode Island — 18 websites ranked by shared content topics, category and on-page relevance.

Each result shows its full tech stack, contacts and AI-policy — not just a name · Browse all sites in College Education →

Domain	Match	Title	Country/Lang	Category	AI files	Contact	AI-protection
harvard.edu ↗	46 match 9 shared linkers · same topic	Harvard University	en	college-education WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
ri.gov ↗	100 match 13 shared linkers	RI.gov: Rhode Island Government	en	government-business	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
brown.edu ↗	93 match 12 shared linkers · same topic	Brown University	en	college-education Kirby	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
uconn.edu ↗	89 match 8 shared linkers · same topic	University of Connecticut	en	college-education WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
usc.edu ↗	55 match 8 shared linkers · same topic	University of Southern California	en	college-education WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
oup.com ↗	32 match 8 shared linkers · same topic	Homepage - Oxford University Press	en	education WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
sagepub.com ↗	30 match 10 shared linkers	Sage - a global academic publisher of educational resources \| Home	United States~ en	publishing-industry	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
doi.org ↗	12 match 12 shared linkers	Home Page	en	non-profit-organizations	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
nytimes.com ↗	8 match 8 shared linkers	The New York Times - Breaking News, US News, World News and Videos	en	media-industry WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
risd.edu ↗	75 match shared topic	Rhode Island School of Design	en	college-education Drupal	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
providence.edu ↗	75 match shared topic	Providence College \| A Catholic College in Rhode Island and New England	en	college-education WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	email phone	none
ric.edu ↗	75 match shared topic	Rhode Island College \| Rhode Island College	en	college-education Drupal	robotsllmsaihumans	email phone	none
stanford.edu ↗	65 match shared topic	Stanford University	en	college-education Storyblok	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
berkeley.edu ↗	65 match shared topic	University of California, Berkeley: Home	en	college-education WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
cornell.edu ↗	65 match shared topic	Cornell University	en	college-education	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
upenn.edu ↗	65 match shared topic	University of Pennsylvania	en	college-education Drupal	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
nyu.edu ↗	65 match shared topic	New York University	en	college-education Adobe Experience Manager	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
utexas.edu ↗	65 match shared topic	The University of Texas at Austin	en	college-education Drupal	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

shared topics how many of the same fine‑grained content topics (IAB sub‑categories) both sites cover — the main signal.
same category whether they sit in the same business / industry category.
content & title how closely their titles and page descriptions line up in wording and meaning.

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.